Public bug reported:
# qemu-kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 0.13.50 (qemu-kvm-devel), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
Bellard
The following disk is presented to guest as IDE disk with /dev/sdd as
path.
# fdisk -l /dev/sdd
Disk /dev/sdd: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/tr
** Attachment added: "qemu's version on Solaris partition table"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618533/+attachment/1492913/+files/opensolaris-qemu.png
--
OpenSolaris guest fails to see the Solaris partitions of a physical disk in
qemu-kvm- (GIT)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618533
Y
** Attachment added: "VirtualBox's version of Solaris partition table."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/618533/+attachment/1492914/+files/opensolaris-vbox.png
--
OpenSolaris guest fails to see the Solaris partitions of a physical disk in
qemu-kvm- (GIT)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Qemu's version of partition table is gotten using a OpenSolaris b134
livecd because I couldn't really boot the disk.
Basically, somehow all the slice labels are missing when booted in Qemu.
OpenSolaris thinks that /dev/sdd3 (which is a primary Solaris 'bf' type
partition) is not sliced. Hence, its
This is a showstopper bug for me to adopt KVM as the virtualization
solution because I just can't boot my OpenSolaris guest. I want to move
to KVM because of in-kernel support and better SMP support.
--
OpenSolaris guest fails to see the Solaris partitions of a physical disk in
qemu-kvm- (GI
Hello list,
I am trying to write to an usb image file using OpenBSD 4.7 as guest and
a fresh "QEMU emulator version 0.12.90". While trying to access the
device I got the following error messages:
snip~~~
umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "QEMU 0.12.90 QEMU
On 08/15/2010 11:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Given that it's known to have a lot of issues, I would suggest that we
schedule Windows host support for deprecation in 0.15. I would not
recommend that we remove any of the WIN32 code from the build but
basically stop trying to make it even build un
On 08/16/2010 04:27 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote:
Appears to be a gcc bug. I opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624279 to track this.
Meanwhile, installing the gcc44 package and building with it
(./configure --cc=gcc44) appears to work.
Avi,
Gcc44 works for me.
I saw Jakub marked t
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 02:37 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/12/2010 09:10 AM, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Anthony PERARD
> >>>
> >>> Xen currently uses a differe
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 02:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 08/12/2010 09:09 AM, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
> >> From: Anthony PERARD
> >>
> >> Introduce functions to read and write the state of the VM in xenstore.
> >
> > This basically creates a
Looks to be fixed by
commit 14ac15d3ac8e0ef1c91204e2ac772b6412a6b99e
Author: Anthony Liguori
Date: Tue May 11 07:56:30 2010 -0500
Update SeaBIOS
- 7d09d0e Fix virtio compile errors on various gcc versions.
- 89acfa3 Support for booting from virtio disks
- 6d66316 smbios: av
On 08/16/2010 01:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/13/2010 02:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/12/2010 09:09 AM, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
From: Anthony PERARD
Introduce functions to read and write the state of the VM in xenstore
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/16/2010 01:15 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 08/13/2010 02:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>> On 08/12/2010 09:09 AM, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
> From: Anthony PERARD
>
>
Am 12.08.2010 16:09, schrieb stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com:
> From: Anthony PERARD
>
> Add the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu;
> this is groundwork to add Xen device model support in Qemu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Why does this need
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.08.2010 16:09, schrieb stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com:
> > From: Anthony PERARD
> >
> > Add the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu;
> > this is groundwork to add Xen device model support in Qemu.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
> >
Am 16.08.2010 16:04, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 12.08.2010 16:09, schrieb stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com:
>>> From: Anthony PERARD
>>>
>>> Add the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu;
>>> this is groundwork to add Xen device model support in
On 08/16/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.08.2010 16:04, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 12.08.2010 16:09, schrieb stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com:
From: Anthony PERARD
Add the Xen FV (Fully Virtualized) machine to Qemu;
this is g
Am 16.08.2010 16:38, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 08/16/2010 09:13 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 16.08.2010 16:04, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>
Am 12.08.2010 16:09, schrieb stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com:
> From: Anth
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Right, I agree. This is why I put the exception for the platform device.
> There are probably some more devices for which the same applies.
>
> But these exceptions all about guest state. If qdev was finished, this
> would be a matter of having a different
On 08/16/2010 09:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 16.08.2010 16:38, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
To be honest, I think we'll need KVM, Xen, and QEMU specific machines.
The right default set of hardware for all three is different.
Right, I agree. This is why I put the exception for the platfo
Am 02.08.2010 17:31, schrieb Bernhard Kohl:
> The header for the MODE SENSE(10) command is 8 bytes long.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl
> ---
> hw/scsi-disk.c | 35 ---
> 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/scsi-disk.c b/hw/
Am 02.08.2010 17:31, schrieb Bernhard Kohl:
> If the page control (PC) field in the MODE SENSE command defines Changeable
> Values to be returned in the mode pages, don't return any mode page as there
> is no support to change any values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kohl
> ---
> hw/scsi-disk.c |
Am 02.08.2010 17:31, schrieb Bernhard Kohl:
> The block descriptor contains the number of blocks, not the highest LBA.
> Real hard disks return 0 if the number of blocks exceed the maximum 0xFF.
>
> SCSI-Spec:
> http://ldkelley.com/SCSI2/SCSI2/SCSI2-08.html#8.3.3
> The number of blocks field s
Am 02.08.2010 17:31, schrieb Bernhard Kohl:
> This series fixes some issues with the MODE SENSE command.
>
> I have an OS which fails during this command. It works fine with
> real SCSI disk hardware.
In general this series looks fine. I had some minor comments that I'd
like to have addressed bef
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
wrote:
> This introduces emulation for the AMD IOMMU, described in "AMD I/O
> Virtualization Technology (IOMMU) Specification".
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
> ---
> Makefile.target | 2 +
> hw/amd_iommu.c | 688
> ++
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Blue Swirl writes:
>
>> +For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:
>> +
>> +#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
>> + do { printf("IRQ: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
>
> That's not C99 syntax, the com
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi Blue,
>
> Thanks for putting this document together. It should be quiet helpful!
>
> On 08/15/2010 12:50 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> Add C type rules, adapted from libvirt HACKING. Also include
>> a description of special QEMU scalar ty
On 08/16/2010 01:05 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Blue Swirl writes:
+For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:
+
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) \
+do { printf("IRQ: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } whi
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/11/2010 11:34 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Weil
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since several months, QEMU for Windows (and mingw32 cross builds)
>>> no longer builds without error.
>>>
>>
>>
Thanks, applied.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> According to scc_escc_um.pdf:
> - Reset Highest IUS must update irq status to allow processing
> of the next priority interrupt.
> - rx interrupt has always higher priority than tx on same channel
>
> The documentatio
I came up with this version, it kind of reverses the logic of your
patch but reuses the _items function (renamed _length), please
see if it looks ok and possibly even works.
[sorry about the delay, I was out of office for a while]
Yes, your version works (both on paper and in practice). I'm n
On 08/16/2010 01:51 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/11/2010 11:34 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
Hi,
since several months, QEMU for Windows (and mingw32 cross builds)
no longe
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KvmForum2010
Video's will follow as well (thanks Andrew).
Thanks for everyone for your participation, looking forward for 2011!
Dor
KVM Forum 2010 was quite a success, many thanks to all who participated!
For those who couldn't attend, the presentations are available online now:
(thanks to Andrew Cathrow for pushing them all up)
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM_Forum_2010#Presentations
We were also able to video the speaker
On 08/17/2010 12:50 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
KVM Forum 2010 was quite a success, many thanks to all who participated!
For those who couldn't attend, the presentations are available online now:
(thanks to Andrew Cathrow for pushing them all up)
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/KVM_Forum_2010#Present
* Dor Laor (dl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 12:50 AM, Chris Wright wrote:
> >KVM Forum 2010 was quite a success, many thanks to all who participated!
> >
> >For those who couldn't attend, the presentations are available online now:
> >(thanks to Andrew Cathrow for pushing them all up)
> >
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
thanks,
-chris
I ran qemu from command line with debugcon:
# /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -M pc-0.12 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp
2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name opensolaris -uuid
7efc6da0-e40f-a1c5-0e85-763dc7ff209c -nodefaults -rtc base=localtime -boot dc
-device lsi,id=scsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6
I thought C*H*S was equal to the physical size. if c <16384, h<16, s<63
for the physical, then max size disk it can support is about 8GB. what
gives?
And C*H*S IS equal to the disk size as shown in the fdisk -l output
above.
--
OpenSolaris guest fails to see the Solaris partitions of a physical
Since I have been battling this issue alone in this bug report, here is
the deal: Attached is the patch which applies to 12.5 and 13.5 and fixes
the issue.
Can someone please verify the integrity and apply?
** Patch added: "Fix some wrong ATA commands."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/61
SRU ack, please upload.
--
KVM segmentation fault, using SCSI+writeback and linux 2.4 guest
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595438
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
Status in Kernel Virtual Machine: Confirmed
Status in QEM
41 matches
Mail list logo
