Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-23 Thread erik . rull
Hi all, I'm really sorry, but the bisectioning does not work for the versions that I want to test. I get a bunch of errors when bisectioning. e.g. continuosly: erik@debian:~/qemu-test/qemu-kvm$ make CCx86_64-softmmu/monitor.o In file included from /home/erik/qemu-test/qemu-kvm/qmp-commands

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-20 Thread Erik Rull
Hi Andreas, Andreas Färber wrote: Hi Erik, Am 19.01.2012 20:15, schrieb Erik Rull: Andreas Färber wrote: Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull: [...] there seems to be a difference between the captured cursor for the native X-Windows window and the VNC window that occured somewhere between

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-20 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi Erik, Am 19.01.2012 20:15, schrieb Erik Rull: > Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull: >>> [...] there seems to be a >>> difference between the captured cursor for the native X-Windows window >>> and the VNC window that occured somewhere between 0.14 and 1.0. >> >> The

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-19 Thread Erik Rull
Andreas Färber wrote: Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull: Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest.

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-19 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull: > Erik Rull wrote: >> Erik Rull wrote: >>> Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really >> bad in >> qemu-1.

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-19 Thread Erik Rull
Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori It's a

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-18 Thread Erik Rull
Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori It's a Windows XP guest.

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-18 Thread Erik Rull
Erik Rull wrote: Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori It's a Windows XP guest.

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2012-01-04 Thread Erik Rull
Erik Rull wrote: Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2011-12-19 Thread Erik Rull
Anthony Liguori wrote: On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14 Thanks. Best

Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0

2011-12-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: Hi all, coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in qemu-1.0 with the same guest. What's the specific guest? Regards, Anthony Liguori The cursor more jumps with some delay than moving smoothly. What could be the reaso