On 06/06/2011 10:30 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:27:55 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But i
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:43:27 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 12:43 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, I meant to ask, what's the difference between "low level" and
> >> "unknown".
> >
> > "low level" is EIO, "
On 06/07/2011 12:43 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Sorry, I meant to ask, what's the difference between "low level" and
"unknown".
"low level" is EIO, "unknown" is everything else (EINVAL, EPIPE, ...).
How can you document this to the u
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:32:14 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 10:54 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
> >>> Anthony Liguori wr
On 06/07/2011 10:41 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Luiz Capitulino writes:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
On 06/07/2011 10:54 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Ca
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:39:45 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> >> I'm ok with
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> > Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
>> I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
>> we should make "reason" a
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we should make "reason" a dic
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
> we should make "reason" a dictionary so that we can group rel
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
> we should make "reason" a dictionary so that we can group r
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:27:55 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:08:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I
On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
we should make "reason" a dictionary so that we can group related
information when we extend the field, for example:
"reason": { "no s
On 06/06/2011 06:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf writes:
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/01
Markus Armbruster writes:
> Anthony Liguori writes:
[...]
>> you can call the reason whatever you want, but don't call it
>> stringfied errno name :-)
>
> Care to explain why?
Found a bit of explanation downthread. Sorry for the noise.
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz C
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> B. query-stop-reason
>>
>>
>> I also have a simple solution for it
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
>> started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more
>> space
>> is allocated and the VM is put to run
Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
>>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Hi there
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:51:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
> >>introduce one. Here's what I propose:
> >>
> >>SQMP
> >>query-
On 2011-06-03 15:51, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
>>> introduce one. Here's what I propose:
>>>
>>> SQMP
>>> query-status
>>> ---
On 06/03/2011 08:44 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:39:41 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On
On 06/03/2011 08:41 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
introduce one. Here's what I propose:
SQMP
query-status
Return a json-object with the following information:
- "running":
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:39:41 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berr
On 2011-06-03 15:26, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I think what we're getting at is the need for an enumeration. So let's
> introduce one. Here's what I propose:
>
> SQMP
> query-status
>
>
> Return a json-object with the following information:
>
> - "running": true if the VM is runnin
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 08:26:56AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>errors stop a guest) instead of trying to model an inter
On 06/03/2011 07:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
errors stop a guest) instead of trying to model an internal QEMU
concept (vm_stop()).
If you have other user visible concepts that
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 07:43:24AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
> >>Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark
On 06/03/2011 04:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 03:01:24PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >> On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
On 06/02/2011 02:13 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:33:52 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0
On 06/02/2011 01:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:32:25 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:33:52 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
> >>> Anthony Liguori wr
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:32:25 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 01:09 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who
On 06/02/2011 01:01 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
---
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:00:04 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> There are people who want to use QMP fo
On 06/02/2011 12:57 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space err
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:35:03 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM
> > is
> > started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more
> > sp
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > B. query-stop-reason
> >
> >
> >>
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
B. query-stop-reason
I also have a simple solution for item 2. The vm_stop() accepts a reason
argument, so we could
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> B. query-stop-reason
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I also have a simple solution for item 2. The vm_stop() accepts a reason
> >>> argument, so we could store it somewher
On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:35:03PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
"timestamp": { "seconds": 1265044230, "microseconds": 450486 } }
Valid error reasons could be: "enospc", "eio", etc.
No etc :-) Error reasons should we be well known and wel
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:35:03PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
> >started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more
> >space
On 06/01/2011 04:12 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
There are people who want to use QMP for thin provisioning. That's, the VM is
started with a small storage and when a no space error is triggered, more space
is allocated and the VM is put to run again.
QMP has two limitations that preven
45 matches
Mail list logo
