On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:08:51 -0500
Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 04:25 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 02.06.2011 20:09, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> >>>> I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
> >>>> we should make "reason" a dictionary so that we can group related
> >>>> information when we extend the field, for example:
> >>>>
> >>>> "reason": { "no space": false, "no permission": true }
> >
> > Splitting up enums into a number of booleans looks like a bad idea to
> > me. It makes things more verbose than they should be, and even worse, it
> > implies that more than one field could be true.
>
> I agree. What I had suggested was to not have a reason at all.
Is it better if we add a new enum to query-block? Like the "io-error" key we
have talked about earlier? Like:
"io-error": "no space"
We could have "no space", "low level" (that's how the man page defines EIO) and
"unknown".
