Am 30.09.2007 um 17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 30.09.2007 um 17:05 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 30.09.2007 um 16:37 schrieb J. Mayer:
If someone has a speedup idea for the __APPLE__ case, that could
still be applied separately.
I guess there are some already defined macros in the Apple
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 17:05 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.09.2007 um 16:37 schrieb J. Mayer:
>
> >> If someone has a speedup idea for the __APPLE__ case, that could
> >> still be applied separately.
> >
> > I guess there are some already defined macros in the Apple build
> > environmnet tha
Am 30.09.2007 um 17:05 schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 30.09.2007 um 16:37 schrieb J. Mayer:
If someone has a speedup idea for the __APPLE__ case, that could
still be applied separately.
I guess there are some already defined macros in the Apple build
environmnet that should be used instead. But
Am 30.09.2007 um 16:37 schrieb J. Mayer:
If someone has a speedup idea for the __APPLE__ case, that could
still be applied separately.
I guess there are some already defined macros in the Apple build
environmnet that should be used instead. But I don't know too much
about
this environment.
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 16:28 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.09.2007 um 15:27 schrieb J. Mayer:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:08 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 30.09.2007 um 14:17 schrieb J. Mayer:
> >>> Would this new definition solve the compilation failure ?
> >>>
> >>> #ifndef alway
Am 30.09.2007 um 15:27 schrieb J. Mayer:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:08 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 30.09.2007 um 14:17 schrieb J. Mayer:
Would this new definition solve the compilation failure ?
#ifndef always_inline
#if (__GNUC__ < 3) || defined(__APPLE__)
#define always_inline inline
#el
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 15:08 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.09.2007 um 14:17 schrieb J. Mayer:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:05 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Am 30.09.2007 um 13:45 schrieb J. Mayer:
> >>
> Anyone any idea what might've caused this build failure? I'm fa
Am 30.09.2007 um 14:17 schrieb J. Mayer:
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:05 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi,
Am 30.09.2007 um 13:45 schrieb J. Mayer:
Anyone any idea what might've caused this build failure? I'm fairly
certain I haven't messed with or updated the system headers.
have you just upd
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 14:05 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 30.09.2007 um 13:45 schrieb J. Mayer:
>
> >> Anyone any idea what might've caused this build failure? I'm fairly
> >> certain I haven't messed with or updated the system headers.
> >
> > have you just updated your CVS co ?
>
>
Hi,
Am 30.09.2007 um 13:45 schrieb J. Mayer:
Anyone any idea what might've caused this build failure? I'm fairly
certain I haven't messed with or updated the system headers.
have you just updated your CVS co ?
Yes.
Please try to comment the "always_inline" definition in vl.h /
exec-all.h.
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:09 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> Anyone any idea what might've caused this build failure? I'm fairly
> certain I haven't messed with or updated the system headers.
have you just updated your CVS co ?
Please try to comment the "always_inline" definition in
On 8/31/07, Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 31.08.2007 um 21:45 schrieb Luca Tettamanti:
>
> > Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> >> Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
> >>
> >>> One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
> >>> OS X v10.4. Should thi
Am 31.08.2007 um 21:45 schrieb Luca Tettamanti:
Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
OS X v10.4. Should this work on OS X or should this have been
limited to Linux?
Getting no answer o
Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
>
>> One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
>> OS X v10.4. Should this work on OS X or should this have been
>> limited to Linux?
>
> Getting no answer on this I have prepared a quickfix which
Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas Färber:
One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
OS X v10.4. Should this work on OS X or should this have been
limited to Linux?
Getting no answer on this I have prepared a quickfix which wraps all
dynticks in conditional s
15 matches
Mail list logo