Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-08 Thread Yang Zhong
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 03:11:55PM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:35:42PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > > Referring to your slides, the remaining points for

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I did a bit of work on this back in early 2016 and wrote a paper which analyzes what Intel were doing with Clear Containers back then, and how it fitted with the more distribution-centric view of Fedora and Red Hat, ie that we ideally want a single qemu binary, a single kernel, a single SeaBIOS, et

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-06 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefa...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 11:10 PM > To: Gonglei (Arei) > Cc: Paolo Bonzini; Yang Zhong; Stefan Hajnoczi; qemu-devel > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution! > > On

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-06 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:35:42PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > Referring to your slides, the remaining points for fast boot are: > > * parallelize VCPU initialization: do you have patche

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-06 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
1 AM > > To: Paolo Bonzini > > Cc: Yang Zhong; Stefan Hajnoczi; qemu-devel > > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution! > > > > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 03:00:10PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 05/12/2017 14:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-06 Thread Gonglei (Arei)
> -Original Message- > From: Qemu-devel > [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+arei.gonglei=huawei@nongnu.org] On > Behalf Of Stefan Hajnoczi > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 12:31 AM > To: Paolo Bonzini > Cc: Yang Zhong; Stefan Hajnoczi; qemu-devel > Subject: Re

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-05 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 03:00:10PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/12/2017 14:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > As you kno

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-05 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 05/12/2017 14:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: As you know, AWS has decided to switch to KVM in their clouds. This news make

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-05 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: >>> As you know, AWS has decided to switch to KVM in their clouds. This news >>> make almost all >>> china CSPs(clouds service provider

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-05 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 05/12/2017 13:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: >> As you know, AWS has decided to switch to KVM in their clouds. This news >> make almost all >> china CSPs(clouds service provider) pay more attention on KVM/Qemu, >> especially light VM >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] About the light VM solution!

2017-12-05 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > As you know, AWS has decided to switch to KVM in their clouds. This news make > almost all > china CSPs(clouds service provider) pay more attention on KVM/Qemu, > especially light VM > solution. > > Below are intel solution for light