Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-19 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:33:07 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 24/12/2014 13:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> I don't think these are necessary, and I thought these were just RFC > >> when they were posted. I and mst didn't really understand each other, > >> and I take the fault for not re

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 24/12/2014 13:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> I don't think these are necessary, and I thought these were just RFC >> when they were posted. I and mst didn't really understand each other, >> and I take the fault for not reviewing the submission; however, Peter, >> please hold these for a lit

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 07/01/2015 13:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Maybe it's too optimistic. That's why I'm saying do not trim the tables >> for a couple releases more. > > I think it is too optimistic, and not trimming the tables does not > solv

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 07/01/2015 11:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:07AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 24/12/2014 13:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: I don't think these are necessary, and I thought these were just RFC when they were posted. I and mst didn't really un

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-07 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:07AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 24/12/2014 13:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> I don't think these are necessary, and I thought these were just RFC > >> when they were posted. I and mst didn't really understand each other, > >> and I take the fault for n

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2015-01-07 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Maybe it's too optimistic. That's why I'm saying do not trim the tables > for a couple releases more. I think it is too optimistic, and not trimming the tables does not solve it convincingly enough to my taste. > If you have a bug,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2014-12-24 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 01:25:16PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 24/12/2014 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The following changes since commit d86fb03469e016af4e54f04efccbc20a8afa3e19: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/spice/tags/pull-spice-20141216-1' > > into staging (2014

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2014-12-24 Thread Peter Maydell
On 24 December 2014 at 12:25, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 24/12/2014 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> >> pc: resizeable ROM blocks >> >> This makes ROM blocks resizeable. This infrastructure is required for other >> functionality w

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

2014-12-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 24/12/2014 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The following changes since commit d86fb03469e016af4e54f04efccbc20a8afa3e19: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/spice/tags/pull-spice-20141216-1' > into staging (2014-12-16 16:52:42 +) > > are available in the git repository at: > >