On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Maybe it's too optimistic. That's why I'm saying do not trim the tables > for a couple releases more.
I think it is too optimistic, and not trimming the tables does not solve it convincingly enough to my taste. > If you have a bug, you're changing guest ABI. That's not how we designed it. ACPI tables are just generated firmware. They are *not* ABI. > We're focusing on > migration, but it is just the tip of the iceberg. In fact, I think that's the only issue. Snapshoting firmware at each release is not something we can support. -- MST
