On 09/28/2016 07:19 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 09/28/2016 11:41 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
+tcg_gen_mov_i64(t0, cpu_gpr[rA(ctx->opcode)]);
+tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode)), t0, t0, 32, 32);
Why are you using t0?
Thought about dropping
On 09/28/2016 06:53 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:21:00PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/28/2016 11:41 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
+tcg_gen_mov_i64(t0, cpu_gpr[rA(ctx->opcode)]);
+tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode)), t0, t0, 32, 32);
Why are you
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:21:00PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 11:41 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > +tcg_gen_mov_i64(t0, cpu_gpr[rA(ctx->opcode)]);
> > +tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode)), t0, t0, 32, 32);
>
> Why are you using t0?
Richard, I don't quite u
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 09/28/2016 11:41 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> +tcg_gen_mov_i64(t0, cpu_gpr[rA(ctx->opcode)]);
>> +tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode)), t0, t0, 32, 32);
>
> Why are you using t0?
Thought about dropping it, but wasn't sure if deposit_i64 would ch
On 09/28/2016 11:41 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> +tcg_gen_mov_i64(t0, cpu_gpr[rA(ctx->opcode)]);
> +tcg_gen_deposit_i64(cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode)), t0, t0, 32, 32);
Why are you using t0?
r~
