On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:09:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18:59AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > Michael, Paolo: Are you happy with v4?
> >
> > Looks pretty clean by itself. I sent some
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:09:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18:59AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Michael, Paolo: Are you happy with v4?
>
> Looks pretty clean by itself. I sent some comments but they can be
> addressed later. What worries me most is the c
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:18:59AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Michael, Paolo: Are you happy with v4?
Looks pretty clean by itself. I sent some comments but they can be
addressed later. What worries me most is the code duplication with
regular virtio.
I see two ways to reduce the maintainanc
Il 29/11/2012 10:18, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> Michael, Paolo: Are you happy with v4?
Sure.
> Kevin: Do you want to take this series through the block tree?
Paolo
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This series adds the -device virtio-blk-pci,x-data-plane=on property that
> enables a high performance I/O codepath. A dedicated thread is used to
> process
> virtio-blk requests outside the global mutex and without going through the
> Q
