On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'd prefer some kind of no lock / ignore lock. There is a legitimate
> case where you want to have the shared lock behaviour, but also a
> legitimate one for turning it off. I'm not opposed to the idea --
> there are very re
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:34:30PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Have you ever considered integration with the QEMU NBD server. We
> don't have APIs for enabling it explicitly in libvirt, but it strikes
> me that it could be ideally suited for your needs.
>
> eg a hypothetical libvirt command
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:19:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 04/19 14:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > We've done this successfully for years, for people monitoring their
> > VMs using virt-df, pulling out files using guestfish and so on. We
> > allow you to do it while the guest is live
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:04:19AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:10:36AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we
On Tue, 04/19 14:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Mon, 04/18 09:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:10:36AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Ap
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Mon, 04/18 09:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:10:36AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, 04/18 09:04, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:10:36AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
On 04/18/2016 12:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:12:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Sat, 04/16 16:29, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
the intervene.
Suggested-by: "Dan
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:12:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Sat, 04/16 16:29, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > >virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
> > >the intervene.
> > >
> > >Suggested-by: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> > >Signed
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:10:36AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
> > > the intervene.
> > > +static int raw_lockf(BlockD
On 04/18/2016 04:12 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Sat, 04/16 16:29, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
the intervene.
Suggested-by: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/raw-posix.c |
On Sat, 04/16 16:29, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
> >the intervene.
> >
> >Suggested-by: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> >---
> > block/raw-posix.c | 35 ++
On Sun, 04/17 20:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
> > the intervene.
> > +static int raw_lockf(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvLockfCmd cmd)
> > +{
> > +
> > +BDRVRawState
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:27:55AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
> the intervene.
> +static int raw_lockf(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvLockfCmd cmd)
> +{
> +
> +BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> +int ret;
> +struct flock fl = (st
On 04/15/2016 06:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
virtlockd in libvirt locks the first byte, we lock byte 1 to avoid
the intervene.
Suggested-by: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/raw-posix.c | 35 +++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git
15 matches
Mail list logo
