On 09/23/15 13:47, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:37:08 +0200
> Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/15 10:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300
>>> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>
In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information
to the
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:37:08 +0200
Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 09/23/15 10:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> >> In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information
> >> to the guest, meaning a QEMU upgrade would expose di
On 09/23/15 10:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
>> In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information
>> to the guest, meaning a QEMU upgrade would expose different
>> hardware to the guest OS even if the same machine-type is
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information
> to the guest, meaning a QEMU upgrade would expose different
> hardware to the guest OS even if the same machine-type is being
> used.
>
> The bug was fixed by commit 93