On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:37:08 +0200 Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/23/15 10:04, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:16:24 -0300 > > Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> In 2012, QEMU had a bug where it exposed QEMU version information > >> to the guest, meaning a QEMU upgrade would expose different > >> hardware to the guest OS even if the same machine-type is being > >> used. > >> > >> The bug was fixed by commit 93bfef4c6e4b23caea9d51e1099d06433d8835a4, > >> on all machines up to pc-1.0. But we kept introducing the same > >> bug on all newer machines since then. That means we are breaking > >> guest ABI every time QEMU was upgraded. > >> > >> Fix this by setting the hw_version on all PC machines, making > >> sure the hardware won't change when upgrading QEMU. > >> > >> This series is based on Michael's PCI tree, plus the "Set > >> broken_reserved_end on pc-*-2.4, not 2.5" patch I submitted > >> earlier today. > > I haven't seen this patch on list, perhaps it needs to be resubmitted? > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg05778.html If I'm not mistaken it's link to this series and not to "Set broken_reserved_end on pc-*-2.4, not 2.5" patch.
