On 07/07/2015 11:07, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 07/07/2015 11:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/07/2015 11:00, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> Hi Paolo, Peter,
>>> On 06/22/2015 11:58 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
On 06/22/2015 11:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Au
On 07/07/2015 11:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2015 11:00, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Paolo, Peter,
>> On 06/22/2015 11:58 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2015 11:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> It seems safe because rom_load_
On 07/07/2015 11:00, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Paolo, Peter,
> On 06/22/2015 11:58 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 06/22/2015 11:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote:
>> It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only
>> does an o
Hi Paolo, Peter,
On 06/22/2015 11:58 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 11:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote:
> It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only
> does an overlap check. Is this right?
>>> it does the check
On 06/22/2015 11:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote:
It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only
does an overlap check. Is this right?
>> it does the check + isrom field setting
Is the bug that some overlapping
On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote:
>> > It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only
>> > does an overlap check. Is this right?
> it does the check + isrom field setting
>> >
>> > Is the bug that some overlapping ROMs are not detected? The commit
>> > message is
Hi Paolo,
On 06/22/2015 11:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 22/06/2015 11:26, Eric Auger wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> Do you think that change is sensible? Since this takes place in vl.c I
>> am quite scared but with your experience you may know how much this can
>> be wrong.
>
> It seems safe becau
On 22/06/2015 11:26, Eric Auger wrote:
> ping
>
> Do you think that change is sensible? Since this takes place in vl.c I
> am quite scared but with your experience you may know how much this can
> be wrong.
It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only
does an overlap
ping
Do you think that change is sensible? Since this takes place in vl.c I
am quite scared but with your experience you may know how much this can
be wrong.
Best Regards
Eric
On 06/16/2015 06:07 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On ARM, commit ac9d32e39664e060cd1b538ff190980d57ad69e4 postponed the
> mem
