On 22/06/2015 11:49, Eric Auger wrote: >> > It seems safe because rom_load_all really doesn't load anything, it only >> > does an overlap check. Is this right? > it does the check + isrom field setting >> > >> > Is the bug that some overlapping ROMs are not detected? The commit >> > message is not clear. > The regression is that the both overlap check and isrom setting are not > done since ROM are inserted in the roms list afterwards, at machine init > done time. The bug was not really observed yet I think.
isrom is just an optimization though, right? What is it useful for? Paolo
