Le 16/08/2016 à 19:31, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 16 August 2016 at 18:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>> The best approach I can think of is to add something at the
>>> top of syscall.c that does:
>>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 9
>>> #define IFLA_BR_G
On 16 August 2016 at 18:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> The best approach I can think of is to add something at the
>> top of syscall.c that does:
>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 9
>> #define IFLA_BR_GROUP_FWD_MASK 9
>> #endif
>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 10
>> #defi
Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>>> cod
On 16.08.2016 18:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>>> code assum
On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of i
Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of the
On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of
On 16.08.2016 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
>> b
On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of
