On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:20:56AM +0100, Chris Webb wrote:
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >
> > > Everyone ok with disabling vlans with no config option?
> >
> > Wrong question. You got to ask "anyone *not* ok with disabling vlans
> > with no config option?"
Markus Armbruster writes:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > Everyone ok with disabling vlans with no config option?
>
> Wrong question. You got to ask "anyone *not* ok with disabling vlans
> with no config option?"
We do use socket devices in the form
-net nic,model=e1000,vlan=X,mac=MM
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
>> > > > With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
>> > > > enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance
On 06/08/2010 09:37 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
I see three possible options to handle this.
(1) Write a hub (or morph the current vlan code into this). Then
you can do something like:
qemu -netdev socket,id=p1 \
-netdev user,id=p2 \
> I see three possible options to handle this.
>
>(1) Write a hub (or morph the current vlan code into this). Then
>you can do something like:
>
> qemu -netdev socket,id=p1 \
> -netdev user,id=p2 \
> -netdev dump,id=p3 \
>
On 06/08/10 15:02, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/08/2010 06:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
or disable vlans unc
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:02:27AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 06:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>
So I see two ways to go forward: switc
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:03:33AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 07:13 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:57:09PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/07/2010 04:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
On 06/07/2010 03:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirki
On 06/08/2010 07:13 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:57:09PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 04:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 03:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/08/2010 06:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
or disable vlans unconditionally.
The probl
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> > enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
> > Disable support for vlans by default, add config option to enable.
>
> No. If you want to remove vlan
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:57:09PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 04:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 06/07/2010 03:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> So
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
>> or disable vlans unconditionally.
>>
>
> The problem with disabling vlans unconditionally is that you
On 06/07/2010 04:37 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 03:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
or disable vlan
On 06/07/2010 03:58 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
or disable vlans unconditionally.
The probl
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 03:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
>> or disable vlans unconditionally.
>>
>
> The problem with disabling vlans unconditionally is that you
On 06/07/2010 02:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So I see two ways to go forward: switch default value in my patch,
or disable vlans unconditionally.
The problem with disabling vlans unconditionally is that you break -net
socket and -net dump.
If we can come up with an alternative way
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:52:05AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 11:42 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
>>>
> With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> enabling them leads to user confusion
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > > With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> > > > enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
> > > > Disable support for vlans
On 06/07/2010 11:42 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
Disable support for vlans by default, add config option to enab
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> > > enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
> > > Disable support for vlans by default, add config option to enable.
> >
> > No. If you want to
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> > enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
> > Disable support for vlans by default, add config option to enable.
>
> No. If you want to remove vlan
> With -netdev, there now seems to be little need to support vlans,
> enabling them leads to user confusion and bad performance.
> Disable support for vlans by default, add config option to enable.
No. If you want to remove vlans, then actually do that.
As I've said before if you want a point-poin
23 matches
Mail list logo
