On 12/12/19 11:52 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Damien Hedde writes:
>
>> On 12/11/19 7:59 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Damien Hedde writes:
>>>
Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
in one packet.
>>>
>>> Do w
Damien Hedde writes:
> On 12/11/19 7:59 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Damien Hedde writes:
>>
>>> Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
>>> simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
>>> in one packet.
>>
>> Do we know gdb won't barf on us. Does the negotiated max p
On 12/11/19 7:59 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Damien Hedde writes:
>
>> Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
>> simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
>> in one packet.
>
> Do we know gdb won't barf on us. Does the negotiated max packet size
> only apply to data
On 12/11/19 7:58 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 12/11/19 5:05 PM, Damien Hedde wrote:
>> Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
>> simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
>> in one packet.
>
> While we can send arbitrary length on the wire, we advertise
> Pac
Damien Hedde writes:
> Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
> simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
> in one packet.
Do we know gdb won't barf on us. Does the negotiated max packet size
only apply to data sent to the gdbserver?
>
> Suggested-by: Luc Michel
> S
On 12/11/19 5:05 PM, Damien Hedde wrote:
Since we can now send packets of arbitrary length:
simplify gdb_monitor_write() and send the whole payload
in one packet.
While we can send arbitrary length on the wire, we advertise
PacketSize=MAX_PACKET_LENGTH in handle_query_supported().
We can rai
