Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 01:13:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > First of all, I'm happy that this patch got us into this
> > discussion.
>
> Me too!
>
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Victor Toso writes:
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I'm happy that this patch got us into this
> discussion.
Me too!
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Victor Toso writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >
Hi,
First of all, I'm happy that this patch got us into this
discussion.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Cc: Kevin for an improved chance of getting
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Cc: Kevin for an improved chance of getting any nonsense I might write
>> corrected.
>>
>> Victor Toso writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wro
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 03:16:54PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Cc: Kevin for an improved chance of getting any nonsense I might write
> corrected.
>
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Victor Toso writes:
> >>
Cc: Kevin for an improved chance of getting any nonsense I might write
corrected.
Victor Toso writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Victor Toso writes:
>>
>> > The example output is setting optional member "backing" with null.
>> > This has no r
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:40:50PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Victor Toso writes:
>
> > The example output is setting optional member "backing" with null.
> > This has no runtime impact. Remove it.
> >
> > Problem was noticed when using the example as a test case for Go
> > bindings.
>
Victor Toso writes:
> The example output is setting optional member "backing" with null.
> This has no runtime impact. Remove it.
>
> Problem was noticed when using the example as a test case for Go
> bindings.
"Fix example" and "problem" implies there's something wrong. "No
runtime impact" sou
