Victor Toso <victort...@redhat.com> writes:
> The example output is setting optional member "backing" with null.
> This has no runtime impact. Remove it.
>
> Problem was noticed when using the example as a test case for Go
> bindings.
"Fix example" and "problem" implies there's something wrong. "No
runtime impact" sounds like it's redundant, but not wrong. Wrong or not
wrong?
> Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victort...@redhat.com>
> ---
> qapi/block-core.json | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> index dcc6d41494..302164d575 100644
> --- a/qapi/block-core.json
> +++ b/qapi/block-core.json
> @@ -1542,9 +1542,7 @@
> # "arguments": { "driver": "qcow2",
> # "node-name": "node1534",
> # "data-file": { "driver": "file",
> -# "filename": "hd1.qcow2" },
> -# "backing": null } }
> -#
> +# "filename": "hd1.qcow2" } } }
> # <- { "return": {} }
> #
> # -> { "execute": "blockdev-snapshot",
