On 29/11/2019 08.38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice to
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> Ack.
> >>
> >> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> >> bios rebuild)
On 28.11.19 14:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:11:38 +0100
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Ack.
>>>
>>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
>>> bios rebuild)
>>> as this fixes a regression.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 01:33 PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda
wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:33:57 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now the
On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a bios
rebuild)
as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
If we do another rc of 4.2, I think we definitely want this to be
included, otherwise quite a bunch of things d
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:11:38 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Ack.
> >
> > Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> > bios rebuild)
> > as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
>
> If we do another rc of 4.2, I t
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Ack.
>
> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> bios rebuild)
> as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
I fear that this is a bit late for 4.2... but this should get a
cc:stable.
>
>
>
> On
On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> Ack.
>>
>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
>> bios rebuild)
>> as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
>
> I fear that this is a bit late f
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:33:57 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
[...]
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda
I forgot this:
Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer
[...]
please add the reported-by when merging :)
On 11/28/19 1:33 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now the
> SCLP call will
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a bios
rebuild)
as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
On 28.11.19 13:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer leng
13 matches
Mail list logo
