On 29/11/2019 08.38, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger >> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100 >>>> Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ack. >>>>> >>>>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a >>>>> bios rebuild) >>>>> as this fixes a regression. Opinions? >>>> >>>> I fear that this is a bit late for 4.2... but this should get a >>>> cc:stable. >>> >>> So we would rather ship a qemu regression instead of pushing a 1 line fixup? >>> Peter, what is the current state of 4.2? does it look like we will have an >>> rc4 >>> or is everything else silent. >> >> There isn't currently anything else that would need an rc4. > > I would vote for getting this patch still in. And I think we probably do not > need an > rc4 for that, the fix seems pretty straight forward.
Ok, I'm going to build the binaries and send a pull request today. Thomas
