在 2022/2/18 下午6:22, Eugenio Perez Martin 写道:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:32 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:24:23AM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:29 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:32:48AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
>> This patch adds the ability to n
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> feature.
> This would aid in reaping performance benefits with HW devices
> that implement this feature.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:29 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:32:48AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> >> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> >> for vhost-vdpa backend when th
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:32 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> > This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> > for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> > feature.
> > This would aid in reap
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:32:48AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
feature.
This would aid in reaping perf
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:16 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:23 PM Gautam Dawar wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> > for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> > feature.
> > This would aid in reaping performan
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:27:14AM +, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> [GD>>] Yes , I agree a complete solution that will support the
> emulated virtio device with in_order rx/tx virtqueue functions will
> definitely be better but at the same time it will take considerable
> amount of time and effort. I a
VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to be negotiated for vdpa
devices
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:23 PM Gautam Dawar wrote:
>
> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit for
> vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this feature.
> This would aid in reaping performance benefits wit
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> feature.
> This would aid in reaping performance benefits with HW devices
> that implement this feature.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:23 PM Gautam Dawar wrote:
>
> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> feature.
> This would aid in reaping performance benefits with HW devices
> that implement this feature. At the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:23 AM Gautam Dawar wrote:
>
> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
> for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
> feature.
> This would aid in reaping performance benefits with HW devices
> that implement this feature. At the
12 matches
Mail list logo
