On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:24:23AM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 3:29 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:32:48AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:52:31PM +0530, Gautam Dawar wrote:
>> This patch adds the ability to negotiate VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER bit
>> for vhost-vdpa backend when the underlying device supports this
>> feature.
>> This would aid in reaping performance benefits with HW devices
>> that implement this feature. At the same time, it shouldn't have
>> any negative impact as vhost-vdpa backend doesn't involve any
>> userspace virtqueue operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gautam Dawar <gda...@xilinx.com>
>
>Having features that hardware implements but qemu does not
>means we can't migrate between them.
>So I'd rather see a userspace implementation.
FYI Jason proposed to support VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER in QEMU/Linux as an idea
for the next GSoC/Outreachy. I offered to mentor and prepared a project
description [1], if anyone else is interested, it would be great to have
a co-mentor :-)
I'd be happy to co-mentor for sure, should I edit the wiki to reflect it?
Great :-)
Yes, please edit the wiki page here:
https://wiki.qemu.org/Internships/ProjectIdeas/VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER
Thanks,
Stefano
