RE: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hw/arm: FW first ARM processor error injection.

2024-06-24 Thread Shiju Jose via
> >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hw/arm: FW first ARM processor error injection. > >On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 17:52, shiju.jose--- via wrote: >> >> From: Shiju Jose >> > > > >> diff --git a/hw/arm/arm_error_inject.c b/hw/arm/arm_error_inject.c new >> fi

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hw/arm: FW first ARM processor error injection.

2024-06-24 Thread Peter Maydell
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 17:52, shiju.jose--- via wrote: > > From: Shiju Jose > > diff --git a/hw/arm/arm_error_inject.c b/hw/arm/arm_error_inject.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00..953a9d6705 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/hw/arm/arm_error_inject.c > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > +/* > + * CXL Type 3 (

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hw/arm: FW first ARM processor error injection.

2024-06-24 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:33:16 +0100 Jonathan Cameron escreveu: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:51:15 +0100 > wrote: > > > From: Shiju Jose > Thanks for posting this. > > Given this is going to linux-edac, probably should mention > this is QEMU based error injection. For cross postings > between ke

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] hw/arm: FW first ARM processor error injection.

2024-06-21 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:51:15 +0100 wrote: > From: Shiju Jose Thanks for posting this. Given this is going to linux-edac, probably should mention this is QEMU based error injection. For cross postings between kernel related and qemu lists I tend to stick qemu in the [] of the patch description.