Hi Zhao,
On 3/21/25 11:43 AM, Zhao Liu wrote:
Hi Shaoqin,
Thank you very much for testing!
I tried your series on ARM64, but it reports error at compile time, here is
the error output:
qapi/kvm.json:59:Unexpected indentation.
I guess this is caused by my invalid format and sphinx complains
Hi Shaoqin,
Thank you very much for testing!
> I tried your series on ARM64, but it reports error at compile time, here is
> the error output:
>
> qapi/kvm.json:59:Unexpected indentation.
I guess this is caused by my invalid format and sphinx complains that,
as Markus figured out :-(
What abou
Hi Zhao,
Thanks for your effort to respin the PMU Filter series.
I tried your series on ARM64, but it reports error at compile time, here
is the error output:
qapi/kvm.json:59:Unexpected indentation.
While I compiled it on x86, everything is ok. Could you please check why
it failed on ARM64
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:05:12PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sorry for the long wait, but RFC v2 is here at last.
>
> Compared with v1 [1], v2 mianly makes `action` as a global parameter,
> and all events (and fixed counters) are based on a unified action.
>
> Learned from the discu
Hi folks,
Sorry for the long wait, but RFC v2 is here at last.
Compared with v1 [1], v2 mianly makes `action` as a global parameter,
and all events (and fixed counters) are based on a unified action.
Learned from the discussion with Shaoqin in v1, current pmu-filter QOM
design could meet the req
