On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 05:01, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> Thanks for the very straight answers here. I'll work
> on those two remaining points (windows cross builds, and
> incremental builds).
I did wonder if incremental build was going to be awkward
to test in a CI setup.
Anyway, I think it would be
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 01:02:41PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 19:34, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > Also, the build and make steps worked fine without `--disable-gnutls`.
> > I was trying to not carry over any "exception" type of arguments,
> > unless they proved to be necessary.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:05:04PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >
> > On another thread Thomas said he doesn't want to be responsible of other
> > tests:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg670132.html
> >
> > We could move the set of tests converted from Peter per
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 19:34, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> Also, the build and make steps worked fine without `--disable-gnutls`.
> I was trying to not carry over any "exception" type of arguments,
> unless they proved to be necessary. Maybe Peter can give some more
> info about this (should it be kept or
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 19:27, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 04:26:53PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > If we have a CI setup where KVM reliably works then we should
> > ideally test a --disable-tcg setup somehow. Right now my pullreq
> > tests don't test that because I run them on
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:08:15AM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
> > On 03/02/2020 04.23, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >> This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
> >> "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
>
> >
> > Thanks for doing this! The patch look
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:37:16AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 03/02/2020 04.23, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
> > "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
> >
> > Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 03:36:28PM -0200, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> Hi Cleber,
>
> On 2/3/20 1:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
> > "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
> >
> > Some characteristics were removed for simp
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 04:26:53PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 08:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Question to Peter/Alex/Stefan/Howevermergespullreqsinthefuture:
> >
> > Should the above jobs really be skipped for pull requests, or would it
> > be ok to include them there, too?
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 08:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Question to Peter/Alex/Stefan/Howevermergespullreqsinthefuture:
>
> Should the above jobs really be skipped for pull requests, or would it
> be ok to include them there, too? (in the latter case, the above changes
> could just be dropped)
I don't
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 03/02/2020 04.23, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>> This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
>> "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
>
> Thanks for doing this! The patch looks basically fine to me, but some
> comments below...
>
>
> Question to Peter/
On 07/02/2020 09.37, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 03/02/2020 04.23, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>> This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
>> "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
>>
>> Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
>> will), including:
>> * n
On 03/02/2020 04.23, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
> "remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
>
> Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
> will), including:
> * number of simultaneous make jobs
> * make's syn
On 06/02/2020 14.54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/6/20 2:52 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
>> On 2/6/20 11:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 2/3/20 4:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-
On 2/6/20 2:52 PM, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
On 2/6/20 11:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/3/20 4:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplic
On 2/6/20 11:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/3/20 4:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
will), including:
* number
On 2/3/20 4:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
will), including:
* number of simultaneous make jobs
* make's synchronous out
On 2/6/20 2:03 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/3/20 4:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
will), including:
* number of
Hi Cleber,
On 2/3/20 1:23 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
will), including:
* number of simultaneous make jobs
* make's syn
This is a crude and straightforward mapping of Peter's
"remake-merge-builds" and "pull-buildtest" scripts.
Some characteristics were removed for simplicity sake (but eventually
will), including:
* number of simultaneous make jobs
* make's synchronous output, not needed because of previous point
20 matches
Mail list logo
