[Qemu-devel] target/arm: kvm-unit-tests gicv2 test failures on tcg

2019-03-22 Thread Andrew Jones
Hi TCG GIC developers, There are a few gicv2 test failures when running over TCG that we don't see when running over KVM. I don't believe these are regressions - I'm pretty sure they've been failing since Andre first introduced the tests. I'm just pointing them out now in case anybody would like

Re: [Qemu-devel] target/arm: kvm-unit-tests gicv2 test failures on tcg

2019-03-22 Thread Peter Maydell
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 16:40, Andrew Jones wrote: > Hi TCG GIC developers, > > There are a few gicv2 test failures when running over TCG that we don't > see when running over KVM. I don't believe these are regressions - I'm > pretty sure they've been failing since Andre first introduced the tests.

Re: [Qemu-devel] target/arm: Fix abort on exception return from AArch64 to AArch32

2017-07-12 Thread Alex Bennée
Peter Maydell writes: > On 12 July 2017 at 12:39, Jaroslaw Pelczar wrote: >> Problem manifests itself when we handle the following sequence: >> >> 1. 64-bit Secure EL3 returns to 32-bit Secure EL1 >> 2. 32-bit Secure EL1 performs SMC call to 64-bit Secure EL3 >> 3. 64-bit Secure EL3 performs re

Re: [Qemu-devel] target/arm: Fix abort on exception return from AArch64 to AArch32

2017-07-12 Thread Peter Maydell
On 12 July 2017 at 12:39, Jaroslaw Pelczar wrote: > Problem manifests itself when we handle the following sequence: > > 1. 64-bit Secure EL3 returns to 32-bit Secure EL1 > 2. 32-bit Secure EL1 performs SMC call to 64-bit Secure EL3 > 3. 64-bit Secure EL3 performs return ERET to 32-bit Secure EL1]

[Qemu-devel] target/arm: Fix abort on exception return from AArch64 to AArch32

2017-07-12 Thread Jaroslaw Pelczar
Problem manifests itself when we handle the following sequence: 1. 64-bit Secure EL3 returns to 32-bit Secure EL1 2. 32-bit Secure EL1 performs SMC call to 64-bit Secure EL3 3. 64-bit Secure EL3 performs return ERET to 32-bit Secure EL1] 4. 32-bit Secure EL1 receives prefetch abort If CPU's env->

Re: [Qemu-devel] target-arm: aarch64: ask for suggestion, a few insn implementations for review.

2014-01-27 Thread Peter Maydell
On 23 December 2013 08:13, Dennis Lan (dlan) wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Dennis Lan (dlan) > wrote: >>The problem is that there are still a few insn implementations >> missing in matz's repo, >> so I try to implement them myself[4]. I'm not familiar with qemu tcg, >> so those pa

Re: [Qemu-devel] target-arm: aarch64: ask for suggestion, a few insn implementations for review.

2013-12-23 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Dennis Lan (dlan) wrote: > Hi Folks: >I'm writing this letter mainly for help and suggestion. >I'm using qemu-aarch64[1] from matz's repository, which actually is > not official. > with matz's repo, and trying to build a small gentoo rootfs, I > encountered

[Qemu-devel] target-arm: aarch64: ask for suggestion, a few insn implementations for review.

2013-12-23 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
Hi Folks: I'm writing this letter mainly for help and suggestion. I'm using qemu-aarch64[1] from matz's repository, which actually is not official. with matz's repo, and trying to build a small gentoo rootfs, I encountered a problem with gcc-4.9.0 and if only commit[2] is included, I have rep

Re: [Qemu-devel] (target-arm) Patch for instruction-level tracing, any interest?

2013-04-05 Thread Peter Maydell
On 5 April 2013 07:59, Japheth Lim wrote: > I have written a patch for the ARM TCG that prints the program > counter and any load/store addresses for every instruction that's > run. We use this feature to get detailed traces of our ARM programs. > > We can tidy up and submit the patch; is there an

[Qemu-devel] (target-arm) Patch for instruction-level tracing, any interest?

2013-04-05 Thread Japheth Lim
Hello all, I have written a patch for the ARM TCG that prints the program counter and any load/store addresses for every instruction that's run. We use this feature to get detailed traces of our ARM programs. We can tidy up and submit the patch; is there any interest in this feature? Japheth L

Re: [Qemu-devel] target ARM PC increment

2012-07-03 Thread Peter Maydell
On 3 July 2012 01:53, David Munday wrote: > I'm developing with QEMU to run arm binaries. Right now I can't tell if the > Thumb32 vmul.f64 instruction encoded(ee25 7b07) is executing or not. I would > like to see where QEMU increments the PC so as to see if this instruction is > getting skipped or

[Qemu-devel] target ARM PC increment

2012-07-02 Thread David Munday
Hello, I'm developing with QEMU to run arm binaries. Right now I can't tell if the Thumb32 vmul.f64 instruction encoded(ee25 7b07) is executing or not. I would like to see where QEMU increments the PC so as to see if this instruction is getting skipped or to trace it's behavior. I've looked extens

Re: [Qemu-devel] target-arm

2011-02-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On 11 February 2011 09:52, Santosh wrote: > Will QEMU arm target support Cortex-M4 FPU, ARMv7-M Floating-Point > Extension FPv4? > I don't see cortex-m4 in the cpu list. Is there any plan to support it? Linaro's focus is on the ARM A profile, so we (I) don't have any current plans to add M4 suppo

[Qemu-devel] target-arm

2011-02-11 Thread Santosh
Hello, Will QEMU arm target support Cortex-M4 FPU, ARMv7-M Floating-Point Extension FPv4? I don't see cortex-m4 in the cpu list. Is there any plan to support it? Thanks, Santosh