On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:44:27PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 29.03.2017 08:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
> >>>
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 29.03.2017 08:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Speci
On 29.03.2017 08:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
>>> unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
>>> * microsoft.com
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
> unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
> * microsoft.com publishes a DMARC policy that has p=reject
> * some subscribers use mail systems that ho
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
>> unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
>> * microsoft.com publishes a DMARC policy that has p=reject
>> * some
On 03/28/2017 01:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> (2) I could reconfigure mailman to try to not rewrite anything that
>> we think is likely to be signed (in particular not the body or the
>> subject)
>>* this means dropping the [qemu-devel] tag from the subject, which I'm
>>
On 03/28/2017 12:53 PM, Andrew Baumann via Qemu-devel wrote:
>> (3) I could set dmarc_moderation_action to Munge From, which means that
>> those senders who have a p=reject policy will get their mails
>> rewritten to have a From="Whoever (via the list) "
>> and their actual email i
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:35:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
> unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
> * microsoft.com publishes a DMARC policy that has p=reject
> * some subscribers use mail systems that ho
On 28 March 2017 at 18:53, Andrew Baumann wrote:
>> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
>> (1) I could set dmarc_moderation_action=Reject
>>* this means nobody can subscribe if they've set their dmarc policy
>> to reject (the "if you don't believe in mailing lists we do
> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:36
>
> Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
> unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
> * microsoft.com publishes a DMARC policy that has p=reject
> * some sub
Hi; it's been pointed out to me that we have a problem with qemu-devel
unsubscribing people because of DMARC. Specifically:
* microsoft.com publishes a DMARC policy that has p=reject
* some subscribers use mail systems that honour this and send bounces
for non-verifying emails from those domai
11 matches
Mail list logo
