On 03/28/2017 01:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> (2) I could reconfigure mailman to try to not rewrite anything that >> we think is likely to be signed (in particular not the body or the >> subject) >> * this means dropping the [qemu-devel] tag from the subject, which I'm >> a bit reluctant to do (it seems likely at least some readers are >> filtering on it, and personally I quite like it) >> * if anybody DKIM-signs the Sender: header we're stuck anyway > > For the record I'd strongly prefer this option - I tag all list mail > and so "qemu-devel" appears twice: in subject and as a tag. > Also, if mail is copied to another list, qemu-devel will > still appear as gmail de-duplicates email by msg id. > I can remove tags I don't care about but can't remove > subject prefixes.
I'm ambivalent - I like the prefixes, but don't mind if they are not present (it's easy enough to filter on List-Sender: when the prefix is not reliable). It's especially nice that the prefix lets me tell the difference between mail sent to qemu-devel and qemu-block while still dumping both lists into the same folder. > Is there a way not to munge the name? It's currently rewritten to > add "via qemu-devel" which confuses the clients which think > it's part of the name, and can't be easily stripped away. Not that I know of, but at least the munging only occurs for senders with restrictive DMARC and not for ALL senders. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
