Tim Walker wrote:
>> The FLOZ project
>> http://www.oszoo.org/wiki/index.php/Free_Live_OS_Zoo
> This really is too cool ;)
Thanks ;-)
> What hardware is it running on?
Currently we use a dual xeon 2.8 GHz with hyperthreading and 2 GB
physical RAM.
--
MG55: Mattia Gentilini & 55 Virtual Machines
Mattia Gentilini (QD) wrote:
Tim Walker wrote:
That may not be true - I'm not sure but I think something reasonable
could be done in Java. There is certainly a Java VNC client available
which could play a part.
The FLOZ project
http://www.oszoo.org/wiki/index.php/Free_Live_OS_Zoo
Uses
Tim Walker wrote:
> That may not be true - I'm not sure but I think something reasonable
> could be done in Java. There is certainly a Java VNC client available
> which could play a part.
The FLOZ project
http://www.oszoo.org/wiki/index.php/Free_Live_OS_Zoo
Uses the tightVNC Java applet to connect
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:07:32 +0200
"Christian MICHON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're putting c++ inside the qemu source tree when it is not
> needed (yet).
Perhaps I'm still not making myself clear. I did _not_ suggest that
a WxWidgets GUI be integrated into QEMU. I assumed we were all tal
Christian MICHON wrote:
you're putting c++ inside the qemu source tree when it is not
needed (yet).
if SDL is common to most guest screens: I agree with you
that the gui/toolkit should overlay the SDL.
Yet Fabrice mentionned months ago this was not his
intention, so we should respect it and (ho
you're putting c++ inside the qemu source tree when it is not
needed (yet).
if SDL is common to most guest screens: I agree with you
that the gui/toolkit should overlay the SDL.
Yet Fabrice mentionned months ago this was not his
intention, so we should respect it and (hopefully) close
this long
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:45:24 +0100
Stuart Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:21:46AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
>
> > WxWidgets (www.wxwidgets.org) provides a nice way out of this -
> > provides a uniform API for the application developer, and local
> > look-and-feel
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> I thought I share this with you all. I have been looking into XEN lately and
> someone has developed a GUI-Frontend for it. Here's the link below showing
> images for the GUI interface to manage xen. A similar type GUI interface could
> be done for QEMU.
I thought I share this with you all. I have been looking into XEN lately
and someone has developed a GUI-Frontend for it. Here's the link below
showing images for the GUI interface to manage xen. A similar type GUI
interface could be done for QEMU.
I wonder want programming tool used for it.
h
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:21:46AM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> WxWidgets (www.wxwidgets.org) provides a nice way out of this - provides
> a uniform API for the application developer, and local look-and-feel for
> each platform. WxWidgets can sit on gtk, motif, x11, win32, mac, cocoa
> (doesn't
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 16:34 -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
>
> BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
> GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
> hours would this likely take?
>
> Joe
Firstly, we do not have to start from scratch. There are so
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:17:09 -0500
John Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
>
> > I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for
> > QEMU - There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this.
> > But, I wish they all could come t
John Morris wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for QEMU -
There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this. But, I wish
they all could come together and work together to develop a nice GUI. I
w
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
> I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for QEMU -
> There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this. But, I wish
> they all could come together and work together to develop a nice GUI. I
> would like to see a sub-proje
On Thursday 15 June 2006 23:31, Joe Lee wrote:
> I glad to see many people sharing comments and making suggestions since
> this thread topic started. I seems there enough interest to have a
> GUI-Frontend for QEMU. I am hopeful this can lead to getting something
> started.
>
> I'd like to see a pol
Rick Vernam wrote:
QEMU leaves me with very few 'itches to be scratched' ...
The basic tasks that a QUI should confine itself to, IMO, are already pretty
darn easy - define/manage a VM (via a shell script for me), start it, stop
it, pause it...etc..
Even so, I've been thinking about this for
QEMU leaves me with very few 'itches to be scratched' ...
The basic tasks that a QUI should confine itself to, IMO, are already pretty
darn easy - define/manage a VM (via a shell script for me), start it, stop
it, pause it...etc..
Even so, I've been thinking about this for some time - months pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>
>
>>Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Fro
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> >
> >>BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
> >>GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
> >>hours would this like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
>
>
>>BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
>>GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
>>hours would this likely
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree if that t
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would be intere
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
> GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
> hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would be interested, too, to know how
complica
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> >
> > You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
> > work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
> > without contributing*Footnote 1*.
>
> I am not sure I agree if that thought. It really de
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality GUI-Frontend.
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating
to work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to
criticize without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree if that thought. It really depends on the mission
or goal of the project. In the case f
Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and p
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> > Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
> Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
> adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality GUI-Frontend.
You're right! However, as Julian
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and prefer to use it. O
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Julian Seward wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
> > On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > > Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
> > > con
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
> On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
> > consistent across os's, and part of the original distro. I t
On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
consistent across os's, and part of the original distro. I think
take-up would be huge (well huge-er, current takeup is h
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Btw. regarding your earlier question about a Qemu GUI similar to VMware:
> AFAIK at least two people have posted GUI patches for Qemu (look in the
> mailing list archive); so far there has been little response to that,
> and I suppose t
Joe Lee wrote:
Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
AFAIK "Creating" a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
qemu doesn't have config files, so your question makes no sense.
Well, I was not thinking or suggesting of a crippled qemu version. I
asked th
Thanks for the comments below, It seems that QEMU can easily be used to
run images. I will start to look into the availabe GUI front-ends for QEMU.
- joe
Jan Marten Simons wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 18:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
An VMWare player "appliance" is really just a disk
Jan Marten Simons wrote:
> Have a look at: http://www.oszoo.org/
I wanted to suggest this too.
Also check the Free Live OS Zoo, which I'm currently developing:
http://www.oszoo.org/wiki/index.php/Free_Live_OS_Zoo
--
|\/|55: Mattia Gentilini e 55 mila euri al mese
|/_| 3-Year Degree in Computer Sc
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 18:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> An VMWare player "appliance" is really just a disk image & config file.
> Running a disk image in QEMU is just a matter of executing
>
>qemu -hda /path/to/image
>
> Perhaps adding "-m XXX" to set increased RAM.
>
> This is no harde
On 6/14/06, Joe Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
>
> AFAIK "Creating" a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
> qemu doesn't have config files, so your question makes no sense.
Well, I was not thinking or suggesting o
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:12:43PM -0400, Joe Lee wrote:
> You are right, and the idea is that the person have full interaction
> with the application environment including the underlying LAMP/WAMP
> stack that has been packaged. Users that want to quickly run and
> test-drive the appliance may
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2006 17:53 schrieb Joe Lee:
> Well, I was not thinking or suggesting of a crippled qemu version. I
> asked the question because there are some software
> appliances which are pre-built and pre-configured apps that are built on
> a LAMP stack and packaged as a single image
> ty
You are right, and the idea is that the person have full interaction
with the application environment including the underlying LAMP/WAMP
stack that has been packaged. Users that want to quickly run and
test-drive the appliance may not really need a full VM type application.
Just something that
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:53, Joe Lee wrote:
> > Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
> >
> > AFAIK "Creating" a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
> > qemu doesn't have config files, so your question makes no sense.
>
> Well, I was not thinking or sug
Why on earth would we want to make a crippled version of qemu?
AFAIK "Creating" a VMware virtual machine is just making a config file.
qemu doesn't have config files, so your question makes no sense.
Well, I was not thinking or suggesting of a crippled qemu version. I
asked the question because
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 15:55, Joe Lee wrote:
> I was wondering if there's the capability to have a "vmware player" type
> functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
> with out needing to create virtual machines. May this could be a
> separate product. What's everyones
I was wondering if there's the capability to have a "vmware player" type
functionality to qemu. This is just to allow playing or running images
with out needing to create virtual machines. May this could be a
separate product. What's everyones thought to this?
Joe
___
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:29:45PM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> I doubt this is targeted at QEMU,
I agree. It seems it can do 3 things that qemu currently can't: Use certain
types of host hardware (such as DVD or USB), copy & paste between host and
guest, and support drag & drop. None of thes
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:22 -0700, Mike Swanson wrote:
> Yeah, it barely on topic. But the .vmx files are extremely simple text
> files, and qemu-img creates vmdk disk images.
That was my first thought when I saw this as well.
> Yes, it's possible to
> install operating systems solely withing VM
Yeah, it barely on topic. But the .vmx files are extremely simple text
files, and qemu-img creates vmdk disk images. Yes, it's possible to
install operating systems solely withing VMware (this is the correct
spelling, btw) Player, but you cannot install VMware Tools, even with
the appropriate (wind
Barely on-topic, but since VmWare interop crops up from time to time:
http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
I doubt this is targeted at QEMU, but rather at competing with Microsoft
and VirtualPC. That or they are leaving the low-end market for server
consolidation.
This may in fact be as much V
49 matches
Mail list logo
