On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2015 22:46, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> include/exec/ram_addr.h:if (tcg_enabled()) {
>> include/exec/ram_addr.h:uint8_t clients = tcg_enabled() ?
>> DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL : DIRTY_CLIENTS_NOCODE;
>> memory.c:
On 11/07/2015 22:46, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> include/exec/ram_addr.h:if (tcg_enabled()) {
> include/exec/ram_addr.h:uint8_t clients = tcg_enabled() ?
> DIRTY_CLIENTS_ALL : DIRTY_CLIENTS_NOCODE;
> memory.c:mr->dirty_log_mask = tcg_enabled() ? (1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE)
Hi Paolo, Richard and all,
What is the exact semantic of tcg_enabled() supposed to be and is it
ill-defined in multi-arch?
Currently, tcg_enabled is defined as:
bool tcg_enabled(void)
{
return tcg_ctx.code_gen_buffer != NULL;
}
In the multi-arch work, the tcg_ctx is now multiple per-arch. S
