> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:28:15 +0200
> From: Avi Kivity
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] new SDL keyboard shortcuts to
> start and stop VM
> On 10/27/2009 11:11 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > A qemu gui can easily hide that it actually uses vnc. The only t
On 10/27/2009 11:11 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 10/26/09 17:08, Avi Kivity wrote:
A user starts a VM at a physical box. Everythings fine but he wants to
return to his workstation so he closes the window. He goes back to his
workstation and connects to a VNC server (on a different X server). He
w
On 10/26/09 17:08, Avi Kivity wrote:
A user starts a VM at a physical box. Everythings fine but he wants to
return to his workstation so he closes the window. He goes back to his
workstation and connects to a VNC server (on a different X server). He
wants to now bring up the guest's display.
Us
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/26/2009 05:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
A user starts a VM at a physical box. Everythings fine but he wants
to return to his workstation so he closes the window. He goes back
to his workstation and connects to a VNC server (on a different X
server). He wants to now
On 10/26/2009 05:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Many applications minimize to the system tray without needing two
processes.
Minimizing or hiding the window are different use cases. Now, I'm not
100% convinced this use-case is absolutely required but historically,
it's always come up in disc
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/26/2009 05:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Maybe slightly less than 100%. I meant a native GUI in the same
process as qemu, but talking to QObjects through a scripting language.
The trouble here is that if you want to support being able to close
the gui and open it aga
On 10/26/2009 05:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Maybe slightly less than 100%. I meant a native GUI in the same
process as qemu, but talking to QObjects through a scripting language.
The trouble here is that if you want to support being able to close
the gui and open it again without killing
Avi Kivity wrote:
I'd much rather see a real GUI client, perhaps implemented by
scripting QObjects or QMP.
I'm with you 100% here. I'd rather see our focus put into a proper
gui based on QMP than to tack on features to SDL.
Maybe slightly less than 100%. I meant a native GUI in the sam
On 10/26/2009 03:45 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/23/2009 03:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Your answer may be, this is for a developer and they'll be aware of
all the short comings/gotchas but this ends up being a rather
user-hostile interface. People are never as aware o
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/23/2009 03:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Your answer may be, this is for a developer and they'll be aware of
all the short comings/gotchas but this ends up being a rather
user-hostile interface. People are never as aware of short
comings/gotchas as we'd like them to be
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:28:33 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/23/2009 03:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Your answer may be, this is for a developer and they'll be aware of
> > all the short comings/gotchas but this ends up being a rather
> > user-hostile interface. People are never as aware
On 10/23/2009 03:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Your answer may be, this is for a developer and they'll be aware of
all the short comings/gotchas but this ends up being a rather
user-hostile interface. People are never as aware of short
comings/gotchas as we'd like them to be. If there was no
Am 23.10.2009 15:59, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Well, the whole point of a keyboard shortcut was for me to make things
>> easier.
>
> This is something of a classic debate between providing power users
> every possible knob and function verses overwhelming non-power users
>
Kevin Wolf wrote:
Well, the whole point of a keyboard shortcut was for me to make things
easier.
This is something of a classic debate between providing power users
every possible knob and function verses overwhelming non-power users
with so many features/options that they cannot even get sta
Am 23.10.2009 13:23, schrieb Mulyadi Santosa:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> I really hate this "You don't need this, I know it better" attitude. If
>> it were only for the technical arguments, okay - I can understand that
>> you don't want to add another magic key, and ye
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I really hate this "You don't need this, I know it better" attitude. If
> it were only for the technical arguments, okay - I can understand that
> you don't want to add another magic key, and yes, doing it dynamically
> comes with some complexit
Am 23.10.2009 01:55, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:40:54 -0500
>>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> Yeah, I agree.
>
> When testing migration, for example, I have to type
17 matches
Mail list logo
