On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:12:13AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:21:57PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > >
> > > CCed Michael Tsirkin
> > >
>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:21:57PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > CCed Michael Tsirkin
> >
> > > virtio-style network devices (where the producer and consumer chase
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:21:57PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> CCed Michael Tsirkin
>
> > virtio-style network devices (where the producer and consumer chase
> > each other through a shared memory block) can enter into a
> > bad
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:24:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:21:57PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> CCed Michael Tsirkin
>
> > virtio-style network devices (where the producer and consumer chase
> > each other through a shared memory block) can enter into a
> > bad
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:21:57PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
CCed Michael Tsirkin
> virtio-style network devices (where the producer and consumer chase
> each other through a shared memory block) can enter into a
> bad operating regime when the consumer is too fast.
>
> I am hitting this case ri
virtio-style network devices (where the producer and consumer chase
each other through a shared memory block) can enter into a
bad operating regime when the consumer is too fast.
I am hitting this case right now when virtio is used on top of the
netmap/VALE backend that I posted a few weeks ago: w
