> On Aug 14, 2017, at 3:18 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
> wrote:
>
> On 14/08/17 07:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
>>> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
>>> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
>>> ac
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 3:23 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/18/2017 09:36 AM, Programmingkid wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Programmingkid
>>> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote
On 08/18/2017 09:36 AM, Programmingkid wrote:
>
>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Programmingkid
>> wrote:
>>>
On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
>
>>
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:46 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Programmingkid
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Programmingkid
wrote:
>
>> On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
>>>
On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
> Lately I found out
> On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
486 and p
On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini
wrote:
On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
486 and pentium processors. Using
On Aug 15, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini
wrote:
On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
486 and pentium processors. Using
On 15/08/2017 20:46, Programmingkid wrote:
>
>> On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
>>> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
>>> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
>>> actuall
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 3:18 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
> wrote:
>
> On 14/08/17 07:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
>>> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
>>> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
>>> ac
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
>> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
>> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
>> actually work. Now I am seeing another issue. When I boot
On 14/08/17 07:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
>> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
>> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
>> actually work. Now I am seeing another issue. When I boot Windows NT
>> 4
On 13/08/2017 21:13, Programmingkid wrote:
> Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the
> 486 and pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it
> actually work. Now I am seeing another issue. When I boot Windows NT
> 4.0 I see this error message:
>
> *** STOP: 0x0
Lately I found out that Windows NT 4.0 seems to work well with the 486 and
pentium processors. Using "-cpu 486" made installing it actually work. Now I am
seeing another issue. When I boot Windows NT 4.0 I see this error message:
*** STOP: 0x007B (0x807A8610,0x,0x,0x)
14 matches
Mail list logo