Hi,
I tried to use
http://www.fedoraforum.de/iso/test/rawhide-KDE4-i686-20080109/rawhide-KDE4-i686-20080109.4.iso
image with qemu 0.9.1 (binary version from
http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/download.html).
When I don't use -kernel-kqemu, the kernel boot, but if I used -kernel-kqemu I
got a Ker
Hi,
Host system is a debian sid and guest is debian etch
-kernel-kqemu
does not work.
I am getting a kernel panic.
Please help.
Thanks
Halim
PS. kqemu last Version and qemu from Debian.
Hello,
I came to the same solution after testing qemu on several machines.
The debian packages seem to have this Problem too.
Thanks
On Do, Mär 15, 2007 at 03:58:52 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Halim Sahin wrote:
> >Hello,
> >Is the cvs-repo of qemu down?
> >cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Halim Sahin wrote:
Hello,
Is the cvs-repo of qemu down?
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/qemu co
qemu
gives me a timeout after a few minutes.
The qemu release 0.9.0 does not work for me.
1. DMA not activable in guest
2. kernel-kqemu causes kernel panic (not the debian package)
3.
Hello,
Is the cvs-repo of qemu down?
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/qemu co
qemu
gives me a timeout after a few minutes.
The qemu release 0.9.0 does not work for me.
1. DMA not activable in guest
2. kernel-kqemu causes kernel panic (not the debian package)
3. The shutdown does not
Hi,
Small addition to my previous mail:
The shutdown doesn't work too.
Last message is system halted but qemu does not shut down.
Best regards
Halim
--
Halim Sahin
E-Mail:
halim.sahin (at) t-online.de
___
Qemu-devel mailing
Hello,
On Do, Mär 15, 2007 at 10:21:14 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Halim Sahin a écrit :
> > On Do, Mär 15, 2007 at 11:12:41 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> >> Halim Sahin wrote:
> >>> Hello list,
> >>>
> >>> I experienced several problems with qemu under linux using kernel
> >>> 2.6.18.
> >>> T
Halim Sahin a écrit :
> On Do, Mär 15, 2007 at 11:12:41 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
>> Halim Sahin wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I experienced several problems with qemu under linux using kernel
>>> 2.6.18.
>>> The guest system is a debian testing, the host a debian unstable.
>>> kqemu is the new
Hello,
Now i tried the newest kqemu module under sarge with kernel 2.6.15 as
host and all works fine.
The big question is now why does the same vm not work under the
qemu host with kernel 2.6.18 under debian testing?
Now I.ll try qemu 0.9.0 under my stable sarge system.
Any Ideas what to d
On 3/15/07, Halim Sahin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:14:46AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> is it on a freshly created qemu image, or one created with qemu
> <= 0.8.2 ?
0.8.2 was used to create the image
>
> what is the format of the qemu image ? raw, qcow, qcow
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:14:46AM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> is it on a freshly created qemu image, or one created with qemu
> <= 0.8.2 ?
0.8.2 was used to create the image
>
> what is the format of the qemu image ? raw, qcow, qcow2 ?
Raw
>
> right now (and I'm on windows hosts),
is it on a freshly created qemu image, or one created with qemu
<= 0.8.2 ?
what is the format of the qemu image ? raw, qcow, qcow2 ?
right now (and I'm on windows hosts), latest qemu and 0.9.0
work well. Most of the pb I see with kernel-kqemu are
time out on hdc (cdrom) if I boot on hda with lin
On Do, Mär 15, 2007 at 11:12:41 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> Halim Sahin wrote:
> >Hello list,
> >
> >I experienced several problems with qemu under linux using kernel
> >2.6.18.
> >The guest system is a debian testing, the host a debian unstable.
> >kqemu is the newest version from www.qemu.org.
Halim Sahin wrote:
Hello list,
I experienced several problems with qemu under linux using kernel
2.6.18.
The guest system is a debian testing, the host a debian unstable.
kqemu is the newest version from www.qemu.org.
The guest can not start if I give -kernel-kqemu.
The last message is kernel
Hello list,
I experienced several problems with qemu under linux using kernel
2.6.18.
The guest system is a debian testing, the host a debian unstable.
kqemu is the newest version from www.qemu.org.
The guest can not start if I give -kernel-kqemu.
The last message is kernel panic.
Another proble
On Sunday 20 August 2006 00:25, J M Cerqueira Esteves wrote:
> I submited the attached report to the Debian bug tracking system,
> but just now I noticed that that segfault of hwclock with libc6-i686 (in
> a guest Debian testing system) only occurs if the virtual machine
> is started with -kernel-k
I submited the attached report to the Debian bug tracking system,
but just now I noticed that that segfault of hwclock with libc6-i686 (in
a guest Debian testing system) only occurs if the virtual machine
is started with -kernel-kqemu. Could this be related to some kqemu bug?
Best regards
It crashes shorty after joining a table...
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Gesendet: 10.07.06 18:59:12
> An: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Betreff: Re: [Qemu-devel] -kernel-kqemu Bug? Win2k reboots
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok,
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
How much ram are you allocating the guest?
256MB
What is your host kernel version?
Kernel 2.6.15 (Ubuntu Dapper)
What is your qemu version?
0.8.1 with Mouse Wall and DHCP patch
What is your kqemu version?
1.3.0pre09
How much ram does your host have?
1GB
are crashes qemu with -kernel-kqemu applied. I did not try any
other program seriously :))
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Gesendet: 10.07.06 17:21:18
> An: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Betreff: Re: [Qemu-devel] -kernel-kqemu Bug? Win2k reboots
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I asked this already in user forum, with no replies :((
I have constantly win2k reboots when using -kernel-kqemu. No bluescreen, just
reboot after a few seconds, for example when using PartyPoker software...
Without -kernel-kqemu, it works fine. I expected win
Hi all!
I asked this already in user forum, with no replies :((
I have constantly win2k reboots when using -kernel-kqemu. No bluescreen, just
reboot after a few seconds, for example when using PartyPoker software...
Without -kernel-kqemu, it works fine. I expected win2k to work with this option
I am trying to use kqemu-1.3.0pre7 under few linux boxen
I works for some guests and not for others. Is there a list of guests
that work with -kernel-kqemu? (differences exist even for same kernel but
different distributions..) Is any one using it for Windows98 guest?
-ishwar
_
Hi,
I just found the problem related to the -kernel-kqemu bug with win2k and
'-m 256'. But fixing the bug is another matter !
Fabrice.
Brad Campbell wrote:
Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:01:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jim C. Brown wrote:
-kernel-kqemu virtual
Dan Sandberg wrote:
Brad Campbell wrote:
Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:01:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jim C. Brown wrote:
-kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new
Brad Campbell wrote:
Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:01:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jim C. Brown wrote:
-kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new option.
That was m
Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:01:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jim C. Brown wrote:
-kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new option.
That was me. That was a 33% speedup o
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:01:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jim C. Brown wrote:
> >-kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
> >
> >So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
> >
> >IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new option.
> >
> That was me. That was a 33% speedup on win
Hi!
The latest
http://debian.tu-bs.de/project/kanotix/preview/KANOTIX-2006-Easter-RC2.iso
hangs on boot with -kernel-kqemu after printing
serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
(selected text mode in grub with f4 and removed `quiet' from boot line).
dmesg of a successful boot (with `re
G'day all,
The -kernel-kqemu with linux guest bug is still at large, however it appears if you compile your
kernel with gcc-3.2.2 it will work. (yay!). Further investigation continues.
I've posted a monolithic 2.6.16 kernel compiled with gcc-3.2.2 at
http://fnarfbargle.dyndns.org:81/qemu/
Som
--Resend-- Not sure why but this did not make the list the 1st time around
G'day all,
The -kernel-kqemu with linux guest bug is still at large, however it appears if
you compile your
kernel with gcc-3.2.2 it will work. (yay!). Further investigation continues.
I've posted a monolithic 2.6.16 ker
On 3/21/06, Brad Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neat trick for capturing such groovy stuff..
> In one console :-
>
> cat /dev/ptyzf | tee qemu.oops.log
>
> In another console :-
>
> qemu -hda vm-1.img -kernel /tracks/linux-2.6.15.6/arch/i386/boot/bzImage
> -serial /dev/ttyzf -append
> "cons
Brad Campbell wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Try the following patch:
diff -u -w -r1.39 helper2.c
--- helper2.c 4 Dec 2005 18:46:06 - 1.39
+++ helper2.c 20 Mar 2006 23:38:51 -
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
env->pat = 0x0007040600070406ULL;
env->cpuid_ext_features = 0;
Sorry, still fails at the same place. It recognises the APIC:
...
Found and enabled local APIC!
mapped APIC to d000 (fee0)
...
I noticed that before the 'kernel BUG' message I got a warning that
scrolled off the screen; so I halted qemu and captured it piece by
piece:
...
hda: cache flu
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Try the following patch:
diff -u -w -r1.39 helper2.c
--- helper2.c 4 Dec 2005 18:46:06 - 1.39
+++ helper2.c 20 Mar 2006 23:38:51 -
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
env->pat = 0x0007040600070406ULL;
env->cpuid_ext_features = 0;
env->cpuid_fea
Try the following patch:
diff -u -w -r1.39 helper2.c
--- helper2.c 4 Dec 2005 18:46:06 - 1.39
+++ helper2.c 20 Mar 2006 23:38:51 -
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
env->pat = 0x0007040600070406ULL;
env->cpuid_ext_features = 0;
env->cpuid_features |= CPUID_FXSR | CP
On 3/17/06, Brad Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More info..
> Tried with a brand new shiny 2.6.15.6 kernel..
> screendump and .config at http://fnarfbargle.dyndns.org:81/qemu-oops/
> Also oops2.jpg is the vanilla Debian 2.4 kernel from R3.1
Got the same as oops.jpg when trying on 2.6.12 fro
Hi.
I'm successfully running Windows 2000 guest on qemu (linux host) with
kernel-kqemu, and the speed is excellent. However I can't get linux to
run as a guest (still linux host); no matter what kernel or kernel
config I create, it always BUGs at the same point:
hda: hda1 hda2 hda3
Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day all,
I've had *great* results running win2k and xp with -kernel-kqemu on an
Athlon host under linux 2.6,
however my experiments using a linux guest have resulted in complete
kernel bombs..
Is there anything I should be doing/thinking about when compiling a
linux ker
G'day all,
I've had *great* results running win2k and xp with -kernel-kqemu on an Athlon
host under linux 2.6,
however my experiments using a linux guest have resulted in complete kernel
bombs..
Is there anything I should be doing/thinking about when compiling a linux kernel for use as a guest
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:01 AM Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will update the documentation about "-kernel-kqemu" soon.
>
> To be short: as some people already noticed, this option allows to run
> user code and most of the kernel code on "bare metal". The result is
> usually a noticab
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:29:39PM +0100, Christian MICHON wrote:
> On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
> > VMware...
> >
>
> It hangs my XP host with 100% cpu eaten up, no way to stop qemu,
> or kqemu. I have to reboot, and
Does the copying of instructions occur in user-space or kernel-space?
I would like to port Argos to use the kernel accelerator, but i'm
unsure this is possible considering the accelerator is not open
source.
If the `parsing' and copying of instructions occurs in user-space, i
could instead of inst
On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
> VMware...
>
It hangs my XP host with 100% cpu eaten up, no way to stop qemu,
or kqemu. I have to reboot, and my linux clients freezes very early
Src=CVS (yesterday 09/02/2006)
Host=XP+ming
On 10/02/06, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > -kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
> >
> > So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
> >
> > IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new option.
> >
> That was me. That was a 33% speedup on win2k start
Hi,
I will update the documentation about "-kernel-kqemu" soon.
To be short: as some people already noticed, this option allows to run
user code and most of the kernel code on "bare metal". The result is
usually a noticable speed up. Only the following guest OSes are
supported: Linux, Windows
Jim C. Brown wrote:
-kernel-kqemu virtualizes ring 0 code.
So it basically makes qemu do what VMware does.
IIRC someone reported a 33% speedup with the new option.
That was me. That was a 33% speedup on win2k startup time. kqemu (user
only) has a negligible impact on win2k startup time wh
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi,
I´m sorry, but I´ve been following the CVS commits and I haven´t
understood this new option (fabrice has not written anything to this
list about it and what it does for the end user).
Could someone please shed some light for me and others who didn´t
understand whats goi
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:46:07AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I?m sorry, but I?ve been following the CVS commits and I haven?t
> understood this new option (fabrice has not written anything to this
> list about it and what it does for the end user).
>
> Could someone please shed some l
Jim C. Brown wrote:
This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
VMware...
Win2k-SP4 would not install with -kernel-kqemu, but it runs with it...
All I have to say is..
Oh..My..God.. I'm getting about 60-70% kqemu time. The user interface responsiveness has gone
t
Hi,
I´m sorry, but I´ve been following the CVS commits and I haven´t
understood this new option (fabrice has not written anything to this
list about it and what it does for the end user).
Could someone please shed some light for me and others who didn´t
understand whats going on please?
Thanks,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:04:35PM -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
> VMware...
>
I should probably add, that this new option (-kernel-kqemu) allows for speeds
very close to VMware because it allows kqemu to virtualize most rin
This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer to
VMware...
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
53 matches
Mail list logo
