Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:01 AM Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Hi, > > I will update the documentation about "-kernel-kqemu" soon. > > To be short: as some people already noticed, this option allows to run > user code and most of the kernel code on "bare metal". The result is > usually a noticable speed up. Only the following guest OSes are > supported: Linux, Windows 2000 or XP. The installation of Windows > 2000/XP must be run without the -kernel-kqemu option. > > I did not test the win32 and x86_64 versions of kqemu yet, but the i386 > version is usable. >
I tested it on Windows XP host. But linux.img in linux-test package and Win2k don't boot. A strange thing is that when I used RedHat 7.2 guest, user-kqemu is much slower than no-kqemu. On Fedora Core 4 host, Win2k boots fine and is faster than user-kqemu and no-kqemu. Great! linux.img from linux-test package also works fine with kernel-kqemu, user-kqemu on FC4 host. But FC4-i386-rescuecd.iso guest doesn't boot with kernel-kqemu. It works with user-kqemu and no-kqemu. I can see about TSC error messages. Morphix.iso doesn't boot with kernel-kqemu. It works with user-kqemu and no-kqemu. I couldn't see booting logo. And a strange thing is that when I used Redhat 7.2 guest, user-kqemu is much slower than no-kqemu. And kernel-kqemu is much slower than user-kqemu. It is the same result as on WinXP host. I seems that Linux guest doesn't work well. PS. user-kqemu means no option. Regards, Kazu _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel