On 5 January 2015 at 16:31, alvise rigo wrote:
> It's just because in patch 1/4 of this series we use
> find_machine_info(machine->cpu_model), which could be a NULL pointer.
Well, don't do that, because in that case you'll do the wrong thing
if we take the default value of the cpu model. But I do
It's just because in patch 1/4 of this series we use
find_machine_info(machine->cpu_model), which could be a NULL pointer.
Indeed this patch can be avoided reworking a bit the calling function code.
Regards,
alvise
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 November 2014 at 18:
On 21 November 2014 at 18:07, Alvise Rigo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
> ---
> hw/arm/virt.c | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index e8d527d..4e7b869 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ static
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
---
hw/arm/virt.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index e8d527d..4e7b869 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -151,6 +151,10 @@ static VirtBoardInfo *find_machine_info(const char *cpu)
{
int i;
+
