On 5 January 2015 at 16:31, alvise rigo <a.r...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:
> It's just because in patch 1/4 of this series we use
> find_machine_info(machine->cpu_model), which could be a NULL pointer.

Well, don't do that, because in that case you'll do the wrong thing
if we take the default value of the cpu model. But I don't think
patch 1 is the right approach anyway.

(Also, if you have a series where patch B requires a change or
fix that is put in patch A, then A should come before B in the series.)

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to