Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/21/2011 09:15 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > Definitively you don't know how a Mac works, you don't want to know > and you don't need to. I do not care about the half of MacOS that Apple burns into ROM which Linux does not use, true. On 08/20/2011 07:23 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-21 Thread Natalia Portillo
Definitively you don't know how a Mac works, you don't want to know and you don't need to. El 21/08/2011, a las 23:14, Rob Landley escribió: > On 08/20/2011 09:02 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: >> El 21/08/2011, a las 01:50, Rob Landley escribió: >> >>> On 08/20/2011 07:23 PM, Natalia Portillo wro

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/21/2011 05:04 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 18:42 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : >> On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: or ancient macintosh support >>> >>> Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already >>> in QEMU, you need to glue

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 09:02 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > El 21/08/2011, a las 01:50, Rob Landley escribió: > >> On 08/20/2011 07:23 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > Linux requires the MMU and an almost complete hardware > emulation. Standard m68k emulations (UAE, Aranym and > specially BasiliskI

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-21 Thread Natalia Portillo
El 21/08/2011, a las 11:04, Laurent Vivier escribió: > Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 18:42 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : >> On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: or ancient macintosh support >>> >>> Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already >>> in QEMU, you nee

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-21 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 18:42 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : > On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > >> or ancient macintosh support > > > > Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already > > in QEMU, you need to glue everything, make Toolbox be VERY happy > > about

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Natalia Portillo
El 21/08/2011, a las 01:50, Rob Landley escribió: > On 08/20/2011 07:23 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: Linux requires the MMU and an almost complete hardware emulation. Standard m68k emulations (UAE, Aranym and specially BasiliskII) try to patch the OS to work. >>> >>> That's kinda sa

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 07:23 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: >>> Linux requires the MMU and an almost complete hardware emulation. >>> Standard m68k emulations (UAE, Aranym and specially BasiliskII) >>> try to patch the OS to work. >> >> That's kinda sad. Is there a web page anywhere that elaborates on >> th

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Natalia Portillo
El 21/08/2011, a las 00:42, Rob Landley escribió: > On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: >>> or ancient macintosh support >> >> Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already >> in QEMU, you need to glue everything, make Toolbox be VERY happy >> about its environm

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 06:17 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: >> or ancient macintosh support > > Most of the hardware (but a few required ones like SWIM) is already > in QEMU, you need to glue everything, make Toolbox be VERY happy > about its environment, make Mac OS boot so it can second-boot Linux > (the di

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 15:57 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : >> On 08/18/2011 06:12 AM, François Revol wrote: >>> Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > On 08/17/201

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Natalia Portillo
Hi, El 20/08/2011, a las 21:55, Rob Landley escribió: > On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: >> These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are >> what I used as a basis for my >> Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. > > Can I get t

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> I.E. m68k system emulation doesn't seem to be building in that tree. > > first off all, this branch is only able to build m68k-linux-user qemu/, > then try: > > cd qemu > mkdir build-test > cd build-test > ../configure --disable-werror --target-lis

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2011 04:16 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 15:57 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : >> On 08/18/2011 06:12 AM, François Revol wrote: >>> Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > On 08/17/201

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/18/2011 03:51 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 21:13 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> Hi Laurent, >> >> El 18/08/2011, a las 20:57, Laurent Vivier escribió: >> >>> Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : Hi Laurent, >>> >>> Hi Natalia, >>> >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/19/2011 03:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/19/2011 11:07 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 19 août 2011 à 17:52, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> >>> >>> El 19/08/2011, a las 09:55, François Revol escribió: >> [snip] Release early, release often :p >>> >>> +1Ok, Ok, I th

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/19/2011 03:55 AM, François Revol wrote: > Le 19/08/2011 04:14, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> Hi, >> > > [...] > (no need to quote the full thread!) > He worked on emulating an abandoned, strange, difficult to get, and undocumented hardware, using your 111 patches, and finishe

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le samedi 20 août 2011 à 15:57 -0500, Rob Landley a écrit : > On 08/18/2011 06:12 AM, François Revol wrote: > > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > >> Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > >>> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > These patc

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/18/2011 02:42 PM, Natalia Portillo wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió: > >> >> >> Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" > > a écrit : >> >> > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : >> > > Le mercredi 17 août 201

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/18/2011 06:12 AM, François Revol wrote: > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : >> Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : >>> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are wh

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are what > I used as a basis for my > Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. Can I get these patches as a tarball or a git tree or something? Trying to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-19 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 08/19/2011 11:07 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 19 août 2011 à 17:52, Natalia Portillo a écrit : El 19/08/2011, a las 09:55, François Revol escribió: [snip] Release early, release often :p +1Ok, Ok, I think all m68k core can be submitted except some bitfield operations and fpu instr

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-19 Thread Laurent Vivier
  Le 19 août 2011 à 17:52, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > > El 19/08/2011, a las 09:55, François Revol escribió: [snip] > > Release early, release often :p > > +1Ok, Ok, I think all m68k core can be submitted except some bitfield > operations and fpu instructions.   Just need to know how Anthon

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-19 Thread Natalia Portillo
El 19/08/2011, a las 09:55, François Revol escribió: > Le 19/08/2011 04:14, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> Hi, >> > > [...] > (no need to quote the full thread!) > He worked on emulating an abandoned, strange, difficult to get, and undocumented hardware, using your 111 patches,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-19 Thread François Revol
Le 19/08/2011 04:14, Natalia Portillo a écrit : Hi, [...] (no need to quote the full thread!) He worked on emulating an abandoned, strange, difficult to get, and undocumented hardware, using your 111 patches, and finished it before the wholy more experienced MESS team. The next-cube emu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Natalia Portillo
Hi, El 18/08/2011, a las 21:51, Laurent Vivier escribió: > Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 21:13 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> Hi Laurent, >> >> El 18/08/2011, a las 20:57, Laurent Vivier escribió: >> >>> Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : Hi Laurent, >>> >>> H

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 21:13 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > Hi Laurent, > > El 18/08/2011, a las 20:57, Laurent Vivier escribió: > > > Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > >> Hi Laurent, > > > > Hi Natalia, > > > >> El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier e

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Natalia Portillo
Hi Laurent, El 18/08/2011, a las 20:57, Laurent Vivier escribió: > Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : >> Hi Laurent, > > Hi Natalia, > >> El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" a écrit :

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > Hi Laurent, Hi Natalia, > El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió: > > > > > > > > > Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" a écrit : > > > > > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > > > > Le mer

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Natalia Portillo
Hi Laurent, El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió: > > > Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" a écrit : > > > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > > > Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > > >> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce La

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Michael Roth
On 08/17/2011 06:30 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: Ugh, I'm sorry about that. This is why I should test before using unfamiliar tools. Someone suggested using git format-patch/git send-email instead of a big patch. That's definitely preferred actually, but you should look at breaking this into multi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Laurent Vivier
  Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" a écrit : > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > > Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > >> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > >>> These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread François Revol
Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are what I used as a basis for my Google Summer of Code project to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-18 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a écrit : > On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > > These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are > > what I used as a basis for my > > Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-17 Thread Peter Maydell
On 18 August 2011 00:30, Bryce Lanham wrote: > Ugh, I'm sorry about that. This is why I should test before using > unfamiliar tools. Someone suggested using git format-patch/git > send-email instead of a big patch. git send-email has a "--dry-run" option which I commend to your attention :-) --

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-17 Thread Bryce Lanham
Ugh, I'm sorry about that. This is why I should test before using unfamiliar tools. Someone suggested using git format-patch/git send-email instead of a big patch. Apologies, Bryce Lanham On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: >> >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-17 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are what I used as a basis for my Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. Please don't crap flood the list with a series of 100 patches. Split things in

[Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions

2011-08-17 Thread Bryce Lanham
These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within qemu, and are what I used as a basis for my Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to QEMU. Bryce Lanham Alexander Paramonov (1): linux-user: Signals processing is not thread-safe. Andreas Schwab (3): m68k: add c