Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 21:13 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > Hi Laurent, > > El 18/08/2011, a las 20:57, Laurent Vivier escribió: > > > Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit : > >> Hi Laurent, > > > > Hi Natalia, > > > >> El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" <re...@free.fr> a écrit : > >>> > >>>> Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > >>>>> Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a > >>> écrit : > >>>>>> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: > >>>>>>> These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within > >>> qemu, and are what I used as a basis for my > >>>>>>> Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to > >>> QEMU. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please don't crap flood the list with a series of 100 patches. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Split things into logical chunks such that a series can be > >>> reasonably > >>>>>> reviewed and applied. > >>>>> > >>>>> And I'm not sure this series of patches is ready for inclusion > >>> in qemu > >>>>> mainline as it should break existing m68k emulation... > >>>>> > >>>>> Bryce, you should only post your patches, refering to the > >>> repository on > >>>>> which they apply, i.e. > >>> git://gitorious.org/qemu-m68k/qemu-m68k.git , > >>>>> master branch. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Btw, are you planning on merging it back someday? > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Yes... when it will work correctly. > >>> > >>> > >>> I have at least, to rework 680x0 FPU part (80bit fpu) to not break > >>> the existing one (64bit fpu). > >>> I have to check modified instructions don't break existing m68k > >>> emulation. > >> > >> > >> Maybe Bryce can help you > > > > I don't know if he is courageous enough to review and push 111 > > patches ;-) > > He worked on emulating an abandoned, strange, difficult to get, and > undocumented hardware, using your 111 patches, and finished it before the > wholy more experienced MESS team.
The next-cube emulation is really working ? > He is! xD There is no problem for me, he can do... > >>> Currently, I'm trying to port some parts of BasiliskII into Qemu to > >>> be able to boot MacOS 7.6. > >> > >> > >> Why are you planning to port a hack instead of making a full machine > >> emulation? > > > > Because I'm lazy and dumb: the work is already done, I like cut'n'paste. > > Yeah, you said it! > The work is already done, we have all the hardware emulation that Basilisk > substitutes for hacks. I'm not sure of that... no MMU emulation, no Nubus, no ethernet card, no video card, no SWIM, no SCSI, ... useless with a patched ROM. You know, nights are not long enough... > We only lack the 68k cpu (oh! your patches!!!) and the glue :p this part is not working well as well ... gcc cannot compile linux kernel, some demos fail in gtk-demo, ... > Please don't port Basilisk on top of TCG, I beg to you in the name of some > god of your own choice :( I believe only in Santa Claus, and it's not Christmas. > (1000 Mb floppies patching .sony instead of implementing SCSI and SWIM, no > ethernet controller but a working TCP/IP, oh hell, it's not a Mac, it's a > Match!) Regards, Laurent
