On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:48:06PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Tue) 26 Jul 2016 [15:29:36], Cao jin wrote:
> > Hi Amit
> >
> > I will take care of this.
> > BTW, did't see it in coverity scan outstanding defects, Do I missed or it is
> > checked by other static check tools?
>
> This is checked
On (Tue) 26 Jul 2016 [15:29:36], Cao jin wrote:
> Hi Amit
>
> I will take care of this.
> BTW, did't see it in coverity scan outstanding defects, Do I missed or it is
> checked by other static check tools?
This is checked with the vmstate static checker --
scripts/vmstate-static-checker.py.
The
On 07/26/2016 01:01 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) 05 Jul 2016 [18:47:40], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
From: Cao jin
internal flag msi_in_use in unnecessary, msi_uninit() could be called
directly, and msi_enabled() is enough to check device msi state.
cc: Markus Armbruster
cc: Marcel Apfelbau
On (Tue) 05 Jul 2016 [18:47:40], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> From: Cao jin
>
> internal flag msi_in_use in unnecessary, msi_uninit() could be called
> directly, and msi_enabled() is enough to check device msi state.
>
> cc: Markus Armbruster
> cc: Marcel Apfelbaum
> cc: Paolo Bonzini
> cc: Mi
From: Cao jin
internal flag msi_in_use in unnecessary, msi_uninit() could be called
directly, and msi_enabled() is enough to check device msi state.
cc: Markus Armbruster
cc: Marcel Apfelbaum
cc: Paolo Bonzini
cc: Michael S. Tsirkin
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
Re
