On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:11:32 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> Thanks for the additional details. They were very useful. I was able
> to reproduce this when I manually built spice release 0.10.1, but not
> with the Fedora 0.10.1 package. One difference I noticed is that the
> Fedora version was
On 11/26/2012 04:48 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:41:00 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:41:00 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
> > On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> > >> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > >>> On Wedn
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Hell
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to ge
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> Hello folks,
> >>
> >> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
> >> this into the 1.3 rel
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
Thanks again :)
I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing
Hello,
Am 21.11.2012 14:20, schrieb Eduardo Otubo:
> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
> this into the 1.3 release.
We're in Hard Freeze, so in theory only bug fixes will get accepted for
v1.3. Patches intended for 1.3 should be marked "for-1.3" during this
per
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
> this into the 1.3 release.
>
> Thanks again :)
I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit
yesterday afternoon a
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
Thanks again :)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:48:14PM -0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new syscalls
> to the whitelist when using Q
According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new syscalls
to the whitelist when using Qemu with Libvirt.
[0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
v2: Adding new syscalls to the list: readlink, rt_sigpending, and
rt_sigtimedwait
v3:
* Added new syscalls based o
11 matches
Mail list logo
