On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote: > On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote: > >> On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote: > >>>> Hello folks, > >>>> > >>>> Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get > >>>> this into the 1.3 release. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks again :) > >>> > >>> I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit > >>> yesterday afternoon and unfortunately it still doesn't work for me > >>> (using the same test/reproducer I documented in the RH BZ). I've tried > >>> running QEMU both via libvirt and the command line (using a libvirt > >>> derived command line). > >>> > >>> I'm applying the patches to the F17 QEMU 1.2 package; there is some > >>> minor fixup needed in the configure script but nothing major. > >>> > >>> What is further frustrating is that the debug code (patch 5/5) doesn't > >>> seem to output the problematic syscall. I wanted to investigate this a > >>> bit more before responding, but with the holiday approaching > >>> (Thanksgiving in the US), I'm not sure how much progress I'll be able to > >>> make for the remainder of this week. Sorry about that. > >>> > >>> If you have any further questions about how, or what, I'm testing, just > >>> ask. > >> > >> Paul, Is your host 32 or 64-bit? > > > > 64-bit > > I'm having trouble recreating this. I'm running a Fedora 17 64-bit host > and a Fedora 17 64-bit guest with domain XML that mirrors yours. > > Here's the domain XML I'm using and the resulting QEMU command line: > > Domain XML: http://pastebin.com/DWa4RQ1Y > Command line: http://pastebin.com/2QTWsUhP > > I'm running with QEMU commit 8db972cfa469b4e4afd9c65e54e796b83b5ce3a2 > which is 1.2.0 with: (a) just the first patch applied, as well as with > (b) all of this patch series applied. > > Any thoughts on what could be different?
Like I said earlier, I'm running with the F17 QEMU 1.2 package, qemu-1.2.0-16.fc18 to be exact, with Eduardo's patches applied on top. I'm currently testing another set of interim patches from Eduardo that was sent off-list for testing (you were CC'd); hopefully that will resolve the problem. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat
