On 28 March 2012 14:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.03.2012 15:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 26 March 2012 18:28, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
>>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
>>> +{
>>> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
>>> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> +
>>> +
On 26 March 2012 18:28, Andreas Färber wrote:
> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +
> + class->parent_reset(c);
> +
> + /* TODO Drop this in favor of cpu_arm_reset() calling cpu_reset()
> +
Am 28.03.2012 16:00, schrieb Max Filippov:
> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
> +{
> +ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
> +ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +
> +class->parent_reset(c);
I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'
+static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
+{
+ ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
+ ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
+
+ class->parent_reset(c);
>>>
>>> I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
>>
>> I have suggested it once and I can only say
Am 28.03.2012 15:46, schrieb Max Filippov:
>>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
>>> +{
>>> +ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
>>> +ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> +
>>> +class->parent_reset(c);
>>
>> I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
>
> I have su
Am 28.03.2012 15:40, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 26 March 2012 18:28, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
>> +{
>> +ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
>> +ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> +
>> +class->parent_reset(c);
>
> I thought we were avoidin
>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
>> +{
>> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
>> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> +
>> + class->parent_reset(c);
>
> I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
I have suggested it once and I can only say it again,
please, ca
On 26 March 2012 18:28, Andreas Färber wrote:
> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +
> + class->parent_reset(c);
I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
> +static const TypeInfo
Introduce only one non-abstract type TYPE_ARM_CPU and do not touch
cp15 registers to not interfere with Peter's ongoing remodelling.
Embed CPUARMState as first (additional) field of ARMCPU.
Let reset call cpu_state_reset() for now.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
---
Makefile.target |1 +
