On 07/19/2017 12:08 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> We need that on posterior patches.
>
> following/subsequent/later is probably a better word.
I'd go with 'later'.
Also, s/incomming/incoming/ in the subject
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> We need that on posterior patches.
following/subsequent/later is probably a better word.
other than that;
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> ---
> migration/migration.c | 16 ++--
> 1 file changed,
We need that on posterior patches.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
migration/migration.c | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
index 5a82c1c..b81c498 100644
--- a/migration/migration.c
+++ b/migration/
