On 07/19/2017 12:08 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: >> We need that on posterior patches. > > following/subsequent/later is probably a better word.
I'd go with 'later'. Also, s/incomming/incoming/ in the subject -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
