Unfortunately, the arm_is_secure*() functions cannot be moved either as
they are used within cpu.h.
Greg
On 6 October 2014 16:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 21:47, Greg Bellows wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6 October 2014 15:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> You should use is_a64() rather t
On 6 October 2014 21:47, Greg Bellows wrote:
>
>
> On 6 October 2014 15:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> You should use is_a64() rather than directly looking at
>> env->aarch64, incidentally.
>
>
> Since I am touching arm_current_el(), should I go ahead and fix it to use
> is_a64() as well?
Optional.
On 6 October 2014 15:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 20:45, Greg Bellows wrote:
> > On 6 October 2014 09:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> I checked your git tree and we don't actually use
> >> arm_is_secure_below_el3() anywhere except in
> >> arm_is_secure(), do we? That suggests to m
On 6 October 2014 20:45, Greg Bellows wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 09:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I checked your git tree and we don't actually use
>> arm_is_secure_below_el3() anywhere except in
>> arm_is_secure(), do we? That suggests to me we should
>> just fold the two functions together.
>
>
>
On 6 October 2014 09:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 September 2014 22:49, Greg Bellows wrote:
> > From: Fabian Aggeler
> >
> > arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
> > if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
> > arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU i
On 6 October 2014 18:57, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 06.10.2014 07:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Can these functions live in internals.h rather than cpu.h?
>> (The difference is that internals.h is restricted to only
>> target-arm/ code whereas cpu.h is auto-included for a much
>> wider set of files.
On 06.10.2014 07:56, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 September 2014 22:49, Greg Bellows wrote:
>> From: Fabian Aggeler
>>
>> arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
>> if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
>> arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU is in secure
On 30 September 2014 22:49, Greg Bellows wrote:
> From: Fabian Aggeler
>
> arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
> if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
> arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU is in secure state
> below EL3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fed
Yeah, that would be cleaner, I'll fix it in the next version.
On 30 September 2014 17:50, Edgar E. Iglesias
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Greg Bellows wrote:
> > From: Fabian Aggeler
> >
> > arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
> > if the CPU impl
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:49:14PM -0500, Greg Bellows wrote:
> From: Fabian Aggeler
>
> arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
> if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
> arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU is in secure state
> below EL3.
Hi Greg,
>
>
From: Fabian Aggeler
arm_is_secure() function allows to determine CPU security state
if the CPU implements Security Extensions/EL3.
arm_is_secure_below_el3() returns true if CPU is in secure state
below EL3.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov
Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler
Signed-off-by: Greg Bellow
11 matches
Mail list logo
