On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:42PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Having only migratable flags reported by default on the "host" CPU model
> is safer for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing users may expect "-cpu host" to be migration-safe, if they
>take care of always using compatible hos
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:07:12PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.04.2014 18:48, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > Having only migratable flags reported by default on the "host" CPU model
> > is safer for the following reasons:
> >
> > * Existing users may expect "-cpu host" to be migration-safe
Am 30.04.2014 18:48, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> Having only migratable flags reported by default on the "host" CPU model
> is safer for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing users may expect "-cpu host" to be migration-safe, if they
>take care of always using compatible host CPUs, host kernel
Having only migratable flags reported by default on the "host" CPU model
is safer for the following reasons:
* Existing users may expect "-cpu host" to be migration-safe, if they
take care of always using compatible host CPUs, host kernels, and
QEMU versions.
* Users who don't care aboug m