On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:48:42PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Having only migratable flags reported by default on the "host" CPU model
> is safer for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing users may expect "-cpu host" to be migration-safe, if they
> take care of always using compatible host CPUs, host kernels, and
> QEMU versions.
> * Users who don't care aboug migration and want to enable all features
> supported by the host kernel can simply change their setup to use
> migratable=no.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> ---
> target-i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 9c30957..9ef27fc 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ static int cpu_x86_fill_model_id(char *str)
> static X86CPUDefinition host_cpudef;
>
> static Property x86_host_cpu_properties[] = {
> - DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("migratable", X86CPU, migratable, false),
> + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("migratable", X86CPU, migratable, true),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
> };
>
> --
> 1.9.0
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
